ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2024
Sensitivity Analysis of Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Models During Isometric and Isokinetic Tasks.
Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human-AI Cooperation in Healthcare and Rehabilitation.Delaware journal of public health · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Neural Network Personalized Musculoskeletal Hand Models Against Current Personalization Standards Using Experimental Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fine-Wire Electromyography.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Using muscle-tendon load limits to assess unphysiological musculoskeletal model deformation and Hill-type muscle parameter choice.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sensitivity coefficients are used to understand how errors in subject-specific musculoskeletal model parameters influence model predictions. Previous sensitivity studies in the lower limb calculated sensitivity using perturbations that do not fully represent the diversity of the population. Hence, the present study performs sensitivity analysis in the upper limb using a large synthetic dataset to capture greater physiological diversity. The large dataset (n = 401 synthetic subjects) was created by adjusting maximum isometric force, optimal fiber length, pennation angle, and bone mass to induce atrophy, hypertrophy, osteoporosis, and osteopetrosis in two upper limb musculoskeletal models. Simulations of three isometric and two isokinetic upper limb tasks were performed using each synthetic subject to predict muscle activations. Sensitivity coefficients were calculated using three different methods (two point, linear regression, and sensitivity functions) to understand how changes in Hill-type parameters influenced predicted muscle activations. The sensitivity coefficient methods were then compared by evaluating how well the coefficients accounted for measurement uncertainty. This was done by using the sensitivity coefficients to predict the range of muscle activations given known errors in measuring musculoskeletal parameters from medical imaging. Sensitivity functions were found to best account for measurement uncertainty. Simulated muscle activations were most sensitive to optimal fiber length and maximum isometric force during upper limb tasks. Importantly, the level of sensitivity was muscle and task dependent. These findings provide a foundation for how large synthetic datasets can be applied to capture physiologically diverse populations and understand how model parameters influence predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.