Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37978046›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2024

Sensitivity Analysis of Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Models During Isometric and Isokinetic Tasks.

Maximillian T Diaz, Joel B Harley, Jennifer A Nichols

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Human-AI Cooperation in Healthcare and Rehabilitation.Delaware journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Benchmarking Neural Network Personalized Musculoskeletal Hand Models Against Current Personalization Standards Using Experimental Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fine-Wire Electromyography.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maximillian T DiazJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, BMS JG-56, P. O. Box 116131 Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0002-3972-1046
Joel B HarleyDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Florida, P. O. Box 116130, Gainesville, FL 32611.
Jennifer A NicholsJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, 1275 Center Drive, BMS JG-56, P. O. Box 116131 Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-9197
University of Florida · US

Funding

A Transfer Learning Framework for Creating Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Models of the HandR21EB030068 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI NICHOLS, JENNIFER A. · 2020 to 2020
$561k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB030068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitivity coefficients are used to understand how errors in subject-specific musculoskeletal model parameters influence model predictions. Previous sensitivity studies in the lower limb calculated sensitivity using perturbations that do not fully represent the diversity of the population. Hence, the present study performs sensitivity analysis in the upper limb using a large synthetic dataset to capture greater physiological diversity. The large dataset (n = 401 synthetic subjects) was created by adjusting maximum isometric force, optimal fiber length, pennation angle, and bone mass to induce atrophy, hypertrophy, osteoporosis, and osteopetrosis in two upper limb musculoskeletal models. Simulations of three isometric and two isokinetic upper limb tasks were performed using each synthetic subject to predict muscle activations. Sensitivity coefficients were calculated using three different methods (two point, linear regression, and sensitivity functions) to understand how changes in Hill-type parameters influenced predicted muscle activations. The sensitivity coefficient methods were then compared by evaluating how well the coefficients accounted for measurement uncertainty. This was done by using the sensitivity coefficients to predict the range of muscle activations given known errors in measuring musculoskeletal parameters from medical imaging. Sensitivity functions were found to best account for measurement uncertainty. Simulated muscle activations were most sensitive to optimal fiber length and maximum isometric force during upper limb tasks. Importantly, the level of sensitivity was muscle and task dependent. These findings provide a foundation for how large synthetic datasets can be applied to capture physiologically diverse populations and understand how model parameters influence predictions.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMusculoskeletal SystemHumansIsometric ContractionLower ExtremityMusclesMuscle, SkeletalUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID37978046
PMCPMC10750789
OpenAlexW4388783344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.