Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37977863›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Measuring under-5 mortality and fertility through mobile phone surveys: an assessment of selection bias in 34 low-income and middle-income countries.

David A Sánchez-Páez, Bruno Masquelier, Ashira Menashe-Oren, Ololade Julius Baruwa, Georges Reniers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measuring childhood mortality through mobile phone interviews in Mozambique.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David A Sánchez-PáezDepartment of Economics, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain david.sanchezpaez@uva.es.ORCID 0000-0002-7828-8193
Bruno MasquelierCentre for Demographic Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9585-891X
Ashira Menashe-OrenCentre for Demographic Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4781-5384
Ololade Julius BaruwaCentre for Demographic Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0776-528X
Georges ReniersPopulation Studies Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6582-1692

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to assess sample selection bias in mobile phone survey estimates of fertility and under-5 mortality.

designWith data from the Demographic and Health Surveys, we use logistic regressions to identify sociodemographic correlates of mobile phone ownership and access, and Poisson regressions to estimate the association between mobile phone ownership (or access) and fertility and under-5 mortality estimates. We evaluate the potential reasons why estimates by mobile phone ownership differ using a set of behavioural characteristics.

setting34 low-income and middle-income countries, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa.

participants534 536 women between the ages of 15 and 49. OUTCOME MEASURES: Under-5 mortality rate (U5MR) and total fertility rate (TFR).

resultsMobile phone ownership ranges from 23.6% in Burundi to 96.7% in Armenia. The median TFR ratio and U5MR ratio between the non-owners and the owners of a mobile phone are 1.48 and 1.29, respectively. Fertility and mortality rates would be biased downwards if estimates are only based on women who own or have access to mobile phones. Estimates of U5MR can be adjusted through poststratification using age, educational level, area of residence, wealth and marital status as weights. However, estimates of TFR remain biased even after adjusting for these covariates. This difference is associated with behavioural factors (eg, contraceptive use) that are not captured by the poststratification variables, but for which there are also differences between mobile phone owners and non-owners.

conclusionsMobile phone surveys need to collect data on sociodemographic background characteristics to be able to weight and adjust mortality estimates ex post facto. Fertility estimates from mobile phone surveys will be biased unless further research uncovers the mechanisms driving the bias.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneDeveloping CountriesAdolescentAdultFemaleFertilityHumansMiddle AgedSelection BiasSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDemographyEpidemiologySTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID37977863
PMCPMC10693685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.