ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2024
The critical role of phlebolymphedema in cellulitis associated with lymphedema: Its incidence and economic impact in a large real-world population.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of contemporary randomized controlled trials for treatment of lower extremity lymphedema by intermittent pneumatic compression devices.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema on Cancer Care Costs: Longitudinal and Age-Based Analyses.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Clinical Features, Microbial Epidemiology, and Recurrence Risk of Cellulitis in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- [Cost comparison of conservative vs. surgical treatment of chronic lymphedema].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aims of this study were: to define the incidence of cellulitis in patients with lymphedema (LED) overall and relate this to the etiology of LED; to determine how this rate might be affected by recurrence of cellulitis; and to quantify the contemporary economic burden of treatment. Understanding these factors is essential in developing targeted cellulitis prevention strategies and reducing health care costs.
methodsThe IBM MarketScan Research Database was examined from April 2013 to March 2019 for patients with a new diagnosis of LED (n = 85,601). Based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/ICD-10 diagnosis codes, the incidence and cost of cellulitis were ascertained during the 3-year follow-up period. Incidence rates (per 100 patient-years [PYs]) and cost (per patient per year) of cellulitis were evaluated among all patients with LED and within subgroups of LED etiologies.
resultsAmong the three most common morbidities associated with LED (breast cancer-related lymphedema [BCRL], n = 17,954 [20.97%]; gynecological cancer-related LED [GCRL], n = 1256 [1.47%]; and phlebolymphedema [PLED], n = 8406 [9.82%]), rates of cellulitis were markedly lower for BCRL (8.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8.7-9.2) and GCRL (14.8; 95% CI, 13.4-16.4) vs PLED (47.7; 95% CI, 46.7-48.8). Patients with a history of cellulitis had markedly higher cellulitis rates during follow-up than those without-overall, 74.0% vs 16.4%; BCRL, 42.9%; 95% CI, 39.7%-46.3% vs 7.6%; 95% CI, 7.3%-7.9%; GCRL, 67.5%; 95% CI, 56.4%-80.8% vs 11.0%; 95% CI, 9.8%-12.4%; and PLED, 81.7%; 95% CI, 79.4%-84.1% vs 30.4%; 95% CI, 29.4%-31.4%, respectively. The mean $/patient/year of cellulitis-related costs for a patient with PLED ($2836; 95% CI, $2395-$3471) was significantly greater than that for BCRL ($503; 95% CI, $212-$1387) and GCRL ($609; 95% CI, $244-$1314).
conclusionsThe incidence of cellulitis associated with LED varies by the etiology of LED. PLED has the highest rates of both an initial cellulitis episode and recurrent cellulitis events. Additionally, PLED has one of the largest cellulitis-related total costs per patient per year. Prevention, as well as early identification and treatment of PLED-associated cellulitis, could significantly decrease health care costs and improve patient quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.