Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37977117›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2023

Oncogenic signals prime cancer cells for toxic cell overgrowth during a G1 cell cycle arrest.

Reece Foy, Lisa Crozier, Aanchal U Pareri, Juan Manuel Valverde, Ben Ho Park, Tony Ly, Adrian T Saurin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Experimental evolution of cellular miniaturization reveals a putative mechanism for cell size evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cell size modulates ferroptosis susceptibility.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CDK5 targets p21Molecular medicine reports · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Reece FoyCellular and Systems Medicine, Jacqui Wood Cancer Centre, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Lisa CrozierCellular and Systems Medicine, Jacqui Wood Cancer Centre, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Aanchal U PareriCellular and Systems Medicine, Jacqui Wood Cancer Centre, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Juan Manuel ValverdeCellular and Systems Medicine, Jacqui Wood Cancer Centre, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.
Ben Ho ParkVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Tony LyMolecular Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 5EH, UK.
Adrian T SaurinCellular and Systems Medicine, Jacqui Wood Cancer Centre, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. Electronic address: a.saurin@dundee.ac.uk.
University of Dundee · GBVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21229Wellcome Trust 206211/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CDK4/6 inhibitors are remarkable anti-cancer drugs that can arrest tumor cells in G1 and induce their senescence while causing only relatively mild toxicities in healthy tissues. How they achieve this mechanistically is unclear. We show here that tumor cells are specifically vulnerable to CDK4/6 inhibition because during the G1 arrest, oncogenic signals drive toxic cell overgrowth. This overgrowth causes permanent cell cycle withdrawal by either preventing progression from G1 or inducing genotoxic damage during the subsequent S-phase and mitosis. Inhibiting or reverting oncogenic signals that converge onto mTOR can rescue this excessive growth, DNA damage, and cell cycle exit in cancer cells. Conversely, inducing oncogenic signals in non-transformed cells can drive these toxic phenotypes and sensitize the cells to CDK4/6 inhibition. Together, this demonstrates that cell cycle arrest and oncogenic cell growth is a synthetic lethal combination that is exploited by CDK4/6 inhibitors to induce tumor-specific toxicity.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21G1 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Antineoplastic AgentsCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21Tumor Suppressor Protein p53breast cancerCDK4/6cell cyclecell growthchemotherapygrowth factorsoncogenesp21p53replication stress

Identifiers

PMID37977117
OpenAlexW4388722366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.