Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37976215›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2023

kGWASflow: a modular, flexible, and reproducible Snakemake workflow for k-mers-based GWAS.

Adnan Kivanc Corut, Jason G Wallace

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Proceedings of machine learning research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adnan Kivanc CorutInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-7622-7300
Jason G WallaceInstitute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation grant #1764127University of Georgia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been widely used to identify genetic variation associated with complex traits. Despite its success and popularity, the traditional GWAS approach comes with a variety of limitations. For this reason, newer methods for GWAS have been developed, including the use of pan-genomes instead of a reference genome and the utilization of markers beyond single-nucleotide polymorphisms, such as structural variations and k-mers. The k-mers-based GWAS approach has especially gained attention from researchers in recent years. However, these new methodologies can be complicated and challenging to implement. Here, we present kGWASflow, a modular, user-friendly, and scalable workflow to perform GWAS using k-mers. We adopted an existing kmersGWAS method into an easier and more accessible workflow using management tools like Snakemake and Conda and eliminated the challenges caused by missing dependencies and version conflicts. kGWASflow increases the reproducibility of the kmersGWAS method by automating each step with Snakemake and using containerization tools like Docker. The workflow encompasses supplemental components such as quality control, read-trimming procedures, and generating summary statistics. kGWASflow also offers post-GWAS analysis options to identify the genomic location and context of trait-associated k-mers. kGWASflow can be applied to any organism and requires minimal programming skills. kGWASflow is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/akcorut/kGWASflow) and Bioconda (https://anaconda.org/bioconda/kgwasflow).

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudySoftwarePhenotypeReproducibility of ResultsWorkflowbioinformatics toolGWASk-merspipelinesnakemake

Identifiers

PMID37976215
PMCPMC10755180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.