ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2023
Particle beam radiotherapy in the treatment of WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas: an early experience from Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proton therapy for intracranial meningioma: a single-institution retrospective analysis of efficacy, survival and toxicity outcomes.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of particle beam radiotherapy (PBRT) in the management of patients with WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas.
methodsThirty-six consecutive and non-selected patients with WHO grade 2 (n = 28) and grade 3 (n = 8) meningiomas were treated at the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, from May 2015 to March 2022. The median age of the cohort at PBRT was 48 years. There were 25 and 11 patients treated with PBRT in the setting of newly diagnosed diseases and progressive/recurrent diseases, respectively. PBRT was utilized as re-irradiation in 5 patients. Proton radiotherapy (PRT) and carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT), with a median dose of 60 Gy-Equivalent (GyE), were provided to 30 and 6 patients, respectively.
resultsWith a median follow-up of 23.3 months, the local control rates were 92.0%, 82.0%, and 82.0% at 1, 2, and 3 years for the entire cohort, respectively. Patients with WHO grade 2 meningiomas (100%, 94.1%, 94,1% at 1,2,3 years) had a much better local control than those with WHO grade 3 meningiomas (50%, 25%, 25% at 1,2,3 years; P < 0.001). Three patients, all with WHO grade 3 meningiomas, had deceased at the time of this analysis. Multivariate analyses revealed that WHO grade (grade 2 vs. 3) (p = 0.016) was a significant prognosticator for local control. No severe toxicities (G3 or above) were observed.
conclusionsTreatment-induced efficacy and toxicities to PBRT in WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas were both highly acceptable. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term outcome in terms of disease control, survival, as well as potential late effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.