Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37975882›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2024

Satisfaction with radiotherapy care among cancer patients treated in Germany-secondary analysis of a large multicenter study.

Alexander Fabian, Alexander Rühle, Justus Domschikowski, Maike Trommer, Simone Wegen, Jan-Niklas Becker, Georg Wurschi, Simon Boeke, Mathias Sonnhoff, Christoph A Fink and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bridging gaps in care: medical student home visits and their influence on radiation oncology patients.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Tenth anniversary of the Young DEGRO Team Trial-reflecting on the past, shaping the future.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Patient- and clinician-based evaluation of large language models for patient education in prostate cancer radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander FabianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. alexander.fabian@uksh.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2415-527X
Alexander RühleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Justus DomschikowskiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Maike TrommerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Simone WegenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Jan-Niklas BeckerDepartment of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Georg WurschiDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Simon BoekeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Mathias SonnhoffCenter for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, 28239, Bremen, Germany.
Christoph A FinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lukas KäsmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Melanie SchneiderDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Elodie BockelmannDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin TreppnerInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Hospital Freiburg, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Anja Mehnert-TheuerkaufDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Nils H NicolayDepartment of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
David KrugDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Young DEGRO Group
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEJena University Hospital · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient satisfaction with healthcare has been linked to clinical outcomes and regulatory agencies demand its regular assessment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate patient satisfaction with radiotherapy care and its determinants.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study. Eligible cancer patients anonymously completed questionnaires at the end of a course of radiotherapy. The outcome variable was overall patient satisfaction with radiotherapy care measured with a 10-point Likert scaled single-item. Given patient satisfaction was defined for patients scoring ≥ 8 points. Determinants of given patient satisfaction were assessed by univariable and multivariable analyses. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsOut of 2341 eligible patients, 1075 participated (participation rate 46%). Data on patient satisfaction was provided by 1054 patients. There was a right-skewed distribution towards more patient satisfaction (mean = 8.8; SD = 1.68). Given patient satisfaction was reported by 85% (899/1054) of the patients. Univariable analyses revealed significant associations of lower patient satisfaction with tumor entity (rectal cancer), concomitant chemotherapy, inpatient care, treating center, lower income, higher costs, and lower quality of life. Rectal cancer as tumor entity, treating center, and higher quality of life remained significant determinants of patient satisfaction in a multivariable logistic regression.

conclusionOverall patient satisfaction with radiotherapy care was high across 11 centers in Germany. Determinants of patient satisfaction were tumor entity, treating center, and quality of life. Although these data are exploratory, they may inform other centers and future efforts to maintain high levels of patient satisfaction with radiotherapy care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesOncologyPatient ExperiencePatient SatisfactionRadiotherapySupportive Care

Identifiers

PMID37975882
PMCPMC11111518
OpenAlexW4388765353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.