Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37975879›Full record

ReviewBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

BELB: a biomedical entity linking benchmark.

Samuele Garda, Leon Weber-Genzel, Robert Martin, Ulf Leser

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuele GardaComputer Science Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-8234-8299
Leon Weber-GenzelCenter for Information and Language Processing, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München 80539, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2499-472X
Robert MartinComputer Science Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany.
Ulf LeserComputer Science Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationBiomedical entity linking (BEL) is the task of grounding entity mentions to a knowledge base (KB). It plays a vital role in information extraction pipelines for the life sciences literature. We review recent work in the field and find that, as the task is absent from existing benchmarks for biomedical text mining, different studies adopt different experimental setups making comparisons based on published numbers problematic. Furthermore, neural systems are tested primarily on instances linked to the broad coverage KB UMLS, leaving their performance to more specialized ones, e.g. genes or variants, understudied.

resultsWe therefore developed BELB, a biomedical entity linking benchmark, providing access in a unified format to 11 corpora linked to 7 KBs and spanning six entity types: gene, disease, chemical, species, cell line, and variant. BELB greatly reduces preprocessing overhead in testing BEL systems on multiple corpora offering a standardized testbed for reproducible experiments. Using BELB, we perform an extensive evaluation of six rule-based entity-specific systems and three recent neural approaches leveraging pre-trained language models. Our results reveal a mixed picture showing that neural approaches fail to perform consistently across entity types, highlighting the need of further studies towards entity-agnostic models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of BELB is available at: https://github.com/sg-wbi/belb. The code to reproduce our experiments can be found at: https://github.com/sg-wbi/belb-exp.

Indexed as

Data MiningLanguageNatural Language ProcessingSoftware

Identifiers

PMID37975879
PMCPMC10681865
OpenAlexW4388775058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.