Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37975877›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024

Impact of ACCELERATE Paediatric Strategy Forums: a review of the value of multi-stakeholder meetings in oncology drug development.

Andrew D J Pearson, Teresa de Rojas, Dominik Karres, Gregory Reaman, Nicole Scobie, Elizabeth Fox, Giovanni Lesa, Franca Ligas, Koen Norga, Karsten Nysom and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Collaborative Innovations in Childhood Cancer Therapies.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrew D J PearsonACCELERATE, Brussels, Belgium, Europe.ORCID 0000-0002-8738-5913
Teresa de RojasACCELERATE, Brussels, Belgium, Europe.
Dominik KarresPaediatric Medicines Office, Scientific Evidence Generation Department, Human Division, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gregory ReamanUS Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Nicole ScobieZoe4Life, Vaud, Sullens, Switzerland.
Elizabeth FoxSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Giovanni LesaPaediatric Medicines Office, Scientific Evidence Generation Department, Human Division, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Franca LigasPaediatric Medicines Office, Scientific Evidence Generation Department, Human Division, European Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Koen NorgaAntwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Karsten NysomRighospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Alberto PappoSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Brenda WeigelUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Susan L WeinerChildren's Cancer Cause, Washington, DC, USA.
Gilles VassalACCELERATE, Brussels, Belgium, Europe.
European Medicines Agency · NLSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRRigshospitalet · DKUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Alan B. Slifka FoundationAlex's Lemonade Stand FoundationAndrew McDonough B+ FoundationBoston Children's Hospital, National Brain Tumor SocietyChildren's Cancer Cause Dana Farber Cancer InstituteEvans Foundation for funding the 11th Paediatric Strategy ForumFifth Paediatric Strategy ForumPediatric Brain Tumor FoundationRally Foundation for Childhood Cancer ResearchSolving Kids' Cancer US
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a landscape of an increasing number of products and histology and age agnostic trials for rare patient cancer, prioritization of products is required. Paediatric Strategy Forums, organized by ACCELERATE and the European Medicines Agency with participation of the US Food and Drug Administration, are multi-stakeholder meetings that share information to best inform pediatric drug development strategies and subsequent clinical trial decisions. Academia, industry, regulators, and patient advocates are equal members, with patient advocates highlighting unmet needs of children and adolescents with cancer. The 11 Paediatric Strategy Forums since 2017 have made specific and general conclusions to accelerate drug development. Conclusions on product prioritization meetings, as well as global master protocols, have been outputs of these meetings. Forums have provided information for regulatory discussions and decisions by industry to facilitate development of high-priority products; for example, 62% of high-priority assets (agreed at a Forum) in contrast to 5% of those assets not considered high priority have been the subject of a Paediatric Investigational Plan or Written Request. Where there are multiple products of the same class, Forums have recommended a focused and sequential approach. Class prioritization resulted in an increase in waivers for non-prioritized B-cell products (44% to 75%) and a decrease in monotherapy trials, proposed in Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIP) submissions of checkpoint inhibitors from 53% to 19%. Strategy Forums could play a role in defining unmet medical needs. Multi-stakeholder forums, such as the Paediatric Strategy Forum, serve as a model to improve collaboration in the oncology drug development paradigm.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentNeoplasmsAdolescentB-LymphocytesChildHumansMedical Oncology

Identifiers

PMID37975877
PMCPMC10852613
OpenAlexW4388801609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.