ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Fully Automated Segmentation of Human Eyeball Using Three-Dimensional U-Net in T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel therapeutic strategies to restore vision in ocular hypotony (STRETCH): results from a prospective pilot series.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- A-eye: Automated 3D MRI segmentation and morphometric feature extraction for eye and orbit atlas construction.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and validate a fully automated deep-learning-based tool for segmentation of the human eyeball using a three-dimensional (3D) U-Net, compare its performance to semiautomatic segmentation ground truth and a two-dimensional (2D) U-Net, and analyze age and sex differences in eyeball volume, as well as gaze-dependent volume consistency in normal subjects. Methods: We retrospectively collected 474 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, including different gazing scans, from 119 patients. A 10-fold cross-validation was applied to separate the dataset into training, test, and validation sets for both the 3D U-Net and 2D U-Net. Performance accuracy was measured using four quantitative metrics compared to the ground truth, and Bland-Altman plot analysis was conducted. Age and sex differences in eyeball volume and variability in eyeball volume differences across gazing directions were analyzed. Results: The 3D U-Net outperformed the 2D U-Net with mean accuracy scores >0.95, showing acceptable agreement in the Bland-Altman plot analysis despite a tendency for slight overestimation (mean difference = -0.172 cm³). Significant sex differences and age effects on eyeball volume were observed for both methods (P < 0.05). No significant volume differences were found between the segmentation methods or within each method for the different gazing directions. Significant differences in performance accuracy were identified among the five gazing directions, with the upward direction showing a notably lower performance. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the effectiveness of 3D U-Net human eyeball volume segmentation using T2-weighted MRI. The robustness and reliability of 3D U-Net across diverse populations and gaze directions support enhanced ophthalmic diagnosis and treatment strategies. Translational Relevance: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of using the proposed 3D U-Net model for the automatic segmentation of the human eyeball, with potential applications in various ophthalmic research fields that require the analysis of 3D geometric eye globe shapes or eye movement detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.