Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37975796›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of neurology2024

Longitudinal course of neurofilament light chain levels in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-insights from a completed randomized controlled trial with rasagiline.

Simon Witzel, Jeffrey M Statland, Petra Steinacker, Markus Otto, Johannes Dorst, Joachim Schuster, Richard J Barohn, Albert C Ludolph

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The spectrum of behavioral disorders in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: current view.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon WitzelDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1841-954X
Jeffrey M StatlandUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Petra SteinackerDepartment of Neurology, University of Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Markus OttoDepartment of Neurology, University of Halle, Halle (Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4273-4267
Johannes DorstDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Joachim SchusterDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9577-9541
Richard J BarohnSchool of Medicine, NextGen Precision Health, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Albert C LudolphDepartment of Neurology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DEUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Missouri Health System · US

Funding

University of Kansas Alzheimer's Disease Core CentersP30AG035982 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAHNKEN, JONATHAN D · 2011 to 2020
$16.6M
FDA HHS R01 FD003739NIA NIH HHS P30 AG035982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRasagiline might be disease modifying in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The aim was to evaluate the effect of rasagiline 2 mg/day on neurofilament light chain (NfL), a prognostic biomarker in ALS.

methodsIn 65 patients with ALS randomized in a 3:1 ratio to rasagiline 2 mg/day (n = 48) or placebo (n = 17) in a completed randomized controlled multicentre trial, NfL levels in plasma were measured at baseline, month 6 and month 12. Longitudinal changes in NfL levels were evaluated regarding treatment and clinical parameters.

resultsBaseline NfL levels did not differ between the study arms and correlated with disease progression rates both pre-baseline (r = 0.64, p < 0.001) and during the study (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). NfL measured at months 6 and 12 did not change significantly from baseline in both arms, with a median individual NfL change of +1.4 pg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] -5.6, 14.2) across all follow-up time points. However, a significant difference in NfL change at month 12 was observed between patients with high and low NfL baseline levels treated with rasagiline (high [n = 13], -6.9 pg/mL, IQR -20.4, 6.0; low [n = 18], +5.9 pg/mL, IQR -1.4, 19.7; p = 0.025). Additionally, generally higher longitudinal NfL variability was observed in patients with high baseline levels, whereas disease progression rates and disease duration at baseline had no impact on the longitudinal NfL course.

conclusionPost hoc NfL measurements in completed clinical trials are helpful in interpreting NfL data from ongoing and future interventional trials and could provide hypothesis-generating complementary insights. Further studies are warranted to ultimately differentiate NfL response to treatment from other factors.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisIndansBiomarkersDisease ProgressionHumansIntermediate FilamentsNeurofilament ProteinsBiomarkersIndansNeurofilament Proteinsrasagilineamyotrophic lateral sclerosisclinical trial designneurofilament lightrasagiline

Identifiers

PMID37975796
PMCPMC11235763
OpenAlexW4388775605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.