Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37975556›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2024

A Review of Mechanistic Models for Predicting Adverse Effects in Sediment Toxicity Testing.

Robert M Burgess, Susan Kane Driscoll, Adriana C Bejarano, Craig Warren Davis, Joop L M Hermens, Aaron D Redman, Michiel T O Jonker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert M BurgessOffice of Research and Development/Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling/Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, US Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-5125
Susan Kane DriscollExponent, Maynard, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7653-5947
Adriana C BejaranoShell Global Solutions, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2818-4115
Craig Warren DavisExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Annandale, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1782-2575
Joop L M HermensInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aaron D RedmanExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences, Annandale, New Jersey, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5933-7906
Michiel T O JonkerInstitute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2649-4443

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since recognizing the importance of bioavailability for understanding the toxicity of chemicals in sediments, mechanistic modeling has advanced over the last 40 years by building better tools for estimating exposure and making predictions of probable adverse effects. Our review provides an up-to-date survey of the status of mechanistic modeling in contaminated sediment toxicity assessments. Relative to exposure, advances have been most substantial for non-ionic organic contaminants (NOCs) and divalent cationic metals, with several equilibrium partitioning-based (Eq-P) models having been developed. This has included the use of Abraham equations to estimate partition coefficients for environmental media. As a result of the complexity of their partitioning behavior, progress has been less substantial for ionic/polar organic contaminants. When the EqP-based estimates of exposure and bioavailability are combined with water-only effects measurements, predictions of sediment toxicity can be successfully made for NOCs and selected metals. Both species sensitivity distributions and toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic models are increasingly being applied to better predict contaminated sediment toxicity. Furthermore, for some classes of contaminants, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, adverse effects can be modeled as mixtures, making the models useful in real-world applications, where contaminants seldomly occur individually. Despite the impressive advances in the development and application of mechanistic models to predict sediment toxicity, several critical research needs remain to be addressed. These needs and others represent the next frontier in the continuing development and application of mechanistic models for informing environmental scientists, managers, and decisions makers of the risks associated with contaminated sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 2024;43:1778-1794. © 2023 SETAC. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Geologic SedimentsToxicity TestsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsModels, TheoreticalWater Pollutants, ChemicalAcute and sublethal toxicityCationic divalent metalsMechanistic modelingPassive samplingPolar and nonpolar organic chemicalsSediment toxicitySpecies sensitivity distributions

Identifiers

PMID37975556
PMCPMC11328970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.