ArticleBioscience reports2023
Commentary on: Increased stiffness of omental arteries from late pregnant women at advanced maternal age.
Article in Bioscience reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines for assessing maternal cardiovascular physiology during pregnancy and postpartum.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Guideline
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, pregnancy at age 35 or older, termed 'advanced maternal age (AMA)', is increasing exponentially. As the incidence of pregnancy at AMA has increased, a growing body of evidence has suggested that AMA is also associated with increased risk for adverse maternal and fetal outcomes outside of genetic anomalies. Importantly, despite the mounting evidence and the increased global risk of adverse perinatal outcomes observed, few studies have examined the potential mechanisms underlying this elevated risk in pregnant people ≥35 years of age. Wooldridge and colleagues begin to address this gap in the literature. In their recent report, they examine vessel stiffness in omental resistance vessels obtained from pregnant individuals ≥35 years of age compared with pregnant individuals <35 years of age. Omental arteries were isolated and assessed via pressure myography (mechanical properties) and histological analysis for collagen and elastin content. Overall, the findings from this investigation report that maternal resistance arteries collected from women of AMA were less compliant and had less elastin than arteries obtained from women <35 years of age, suggesting that maternal resistance vessel stiffening in AMA may contribute to increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The authors should be commended for completing these studies in human resistance vessels, which now open new avenues for investigation and provoke a cascade of questions related to maternal cardiovascular adaptations to pregnancy in women ≥35 years of age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.