ArticleJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2023
Diabetes care cascade and their predictors in young and middle-aged population in India: evidence from the National Family Health Survey (2019-21).
Article in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unmasking the Emotional and Behavioral Determinants of Glycemic Control in Diabetes Management.Cureus · 2025Article
- Sleep problems and their predictors in community-dwelling older adults with diabetes in India: Evidence from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India.Sleep medicine: X · 2024Article
- Determination of SRPA and adiposity measures and its association with glycemic status in type 2 diabetics having high mean HbA1c in a private clinic of a city in west India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Weak care cascade of diabetes from the time of screening, diagnosis, treatment initiation and attainment of optimal glycemic control is a public health challenge particularly in resource limited settings. We aimed to assess the diabetes care cascade in India and its determinants in the 15-49 age group. Methods: We conducted a secondary data analysis of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5, 2019-2021), a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, including a total of 724,115 women and 101,839 men with mean (SD) age 30.6 (9.9) years. Results: The prevalence of self-reported Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in the sample was 2.14% (n = 14,116, 95% CI: 2.06, 2.21) of which 55.13% (n = 6990, 95% CI: 53.37, 56.88) were currently undergoing anti-diabetes therapy. The net prevalence of DM including both old and new cases detected on screening was 2.9%. Poor glycemic control was observed in 52.43% (n = 3506, 95% CI: 50.69, 54.16) of patients with DM on anti-diabetes therapy. Patients from the richest wealth quintile (aOR = 5.17, 95% CI: 1.93, 13.84) had significantly higher odds of accessing private health facilities, while female patients with DM were less likely to be on anti-diabetes therapy. Conclusion: The prevalence of self-reported DM in India has increased from 1.7% (NFHS-4, 2015-16) to 2.1% (NFHS-5, 2019-21) while more than half of existing patients continue to remain undiagnosed. Consequently, diabetes care cascade have major lacunae at every stage from screening to diagnosis, initiation of effective treatment, and achievement of safe blood glucose levels. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-023-01263-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.