Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37975032›Full record

ReviewCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2023

E-Scooters and Craniofacial Trauma: A Systematic Review.

Elizabeth Z Goh, Nicholas Beech, Nigel R Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Maxillofacial fractures associated with electric scooter trauma: a cohort study from a national level I trauma center.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  2. Clinical impact and economic burden of electric scooter-related facial fractures in Barcelona.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Are Le fort fracture lines relevant in modern trauma?European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth Z GohFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3091-6920
Nicholas BeechFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-0252
Nigel R JohnsonFaculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7839-3604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: Standing electric scooters (e-scooters) provide a cheap and environmentally friendly transport alternative, but also elicit substantial concern regarding their volume of associated injuries especially in the craniofacial region. This review aims to explore the demographics, risk factors, types of injury and surgical management of craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. Methods: PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. Exclusion criteria were duplicates; non-English publications; non-full-text publications; studies with insufficient data. Results: Of the 73 articles identified, 10 eligible articles representing 539 patients were included. The mean age was 31.5 years. Most cases were male (63.7%). Common risk factors were alcohol/drug intoxication, absence of distal extremity injuries and lack of helmet use. The most common mechanism of injury was mechanical falls (72.4%). The most common facial fracture pattern was middle third fractures (58.3%). Surgical management was required for 43.3% of fractures. Other types of injuries reported were traumatic brain injuries (17.6%), soft tissue injuries (58.3%), dental injuries (32.9%) and ophthalmological injuries (20.6%). Conclusions: The findings of this review suggest common presentations for craniofacial trauma associated with e-scooters. Robust longitudinal evaluations with standardised descriptions of types of injuries are required. Gaps in knowledge relate to surgical management, post-operative complications and associated risk factors.

Indexed as

accident preventionalcoholic intoxicationcraniocerebral traumafacial bonesfacial injurieshead protective devices

Identifiers

PMID37975032
PMCPMC10638976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.