Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37975002›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2023

Phthalocyanine aggregates in the photodynamic therapy: dogmas, controversies, and future prospects.

Dmitry A Bunin, Alexander G Martynov, Daniil A Gvozdev, Yulia G Gorbunova

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Photodynamic Inactivation ofBiomacromolecules · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dmitry A BuninFrumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander G MartynovFrumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Daniil A GvozdevDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3509-7944
Yulia G GorbunovaFrumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a rapidly developing method for the treatment of cancer and bacterial diseases, is based on the photosensitization of oxygen to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) that destroy specific biological targets. Among the various photosensitizers, phthalocyanines (Pc) have attracted particular attention due to their excellent photophysical properties, most of which meet the therapeutic requirements. The statement that aggregation of Pc-based photosensitizers is undesirable because it suppresses ROS generation has become commonplace in PDT. In this review, we have collected and discussed a number of works whose results refute this well-established axiom and show that aggregated forms of phthalocyanines can still exhibit photodynamic activity, in some cases in synergy with the photothermal and optoacoustic effects. In addition, ROS generation can be induced by aggregates under the conditions of sonodynamic therapy.

Indexed as

NanocarrierNanomedicinePhotodynamic therapyPhotophysicsReactive oxygen speciesSelf-assembly

Identifiers

PMID37975002
PMCPMC10643719
OpenAlexW4386777119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.