ReviewBiophysical reviews2023
Physical model of the nuclear membrane permeability mechanism.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Safe and Effective Gene Therapy: Non-Viral Nanostructured Delivery Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Unraveling dynamics of nuclear pore and chromatin via HS-AFM.Anatomical science international · 2026Review
- Article
- VII Congress of Russian Biophysicists-2023, Krasnodar, Russia.Biophysical reviews · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nuclear cytoplasmic transport is mediated by many receptors that recognize specific nuclear localization signals on proteins and RNA and transport these substrates through nuclear pore complexes. Facilitated diffusion through nuclear pore complexes requires the attachment of transport receptors. Despite the relatively large tunnel diameter, some even small proteins (less than 20-30 kDa), such as histones, pass through the nuclear pore complex only with transport receptors. Over several decades, considerable material has been accumulated on the structure, architecture, and amino acid composition of the proteins included in this complex and the sequence of many receptors. We consider the data available in the literature on the structure of the nuclear pore complex and possible mechanisms of nuclear-cytoplasmic transport, applying the theory of electrostatic interactions in the context of our data on changes in the electrokinetic potential of nuclei and our previously proposed physical model of the mechanism of facilitated diffusion through the nuclear pore complex (NPC). According to our data, the main contribution to the charge of the nuclear membrane is made by anionic phospholipids, which are part of both the nuclear membrane and the nuclear matrix, which creates a potential difference between them. The nuclear membrane is a four-layer phospholipid dielectric, so the potential vector can only pass through the NPC, creating an electrostatic funnel that "pulls in" the positively charged load-NLS-NTR trigger complexes. Considering the newly obtained data, an improved model of the previously proposed physical model of the mechanism of nuclear-cytoplasmic transport is proposed. This model considers the contribution of electrostatic fields to the transportation speed when changing the membrane's thickness in the NPC basket at a higher load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.