Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974954›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering2023

Identifying Anomalies while Preserving Privacy.

Hafiz Asif, Jaideep Vaidya, Periklis A Papakonstantinou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hafiz AsifRutgers University, New Jersey, USA.
Jaideep VaidyaRutgers University, New Jersey, USA.
Periklis A PapakonstantinouRutgers University, New Jersey, USA.

Funding

Supplement for high performance compute clustersR35GM134927 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI VAIDYA, JAIDEEP · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
Secure and PrivAte Collaborative EnvironmentS (SPACES) for biomedical analyticsR01GM118574 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ NEWARK · PI VAIDYA, JAIDEEP · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118574NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying anomalies in data is vital in many domains, including medicine, finance, and national security. However, privacy concerns pose a significant roadblock to carrying out such an analysis. Since existing privacy definitions do not allow good accuracy when doing outlier analysis, the notion of sensitive privacy has been recently proposed to deal with this problem. Sensitive privacy makes it possible to analyze data for anomalies with practically meaningful accuracy while providing a strong guarantee similar to differential privacy, which is the prevalent privacy standard today. In this work, we relate sensitive privacy to other important notions of data privacy so that one can port the technical developments and private mechanism constructions from these related concepts to sensitive privacy. Sensitive privacy critically depends on the underlying anomaly model. We develop a novel n-step lookahead mechanism to efficiently answer arbitrary outlier queries, which provably guarantees sensitive privacy if we restrict our attention to common a class of anomaly models. We also provide general constructions to give sensitively private mechanisms for identifying anomalies and show the conditions under which the constructions would be optimal.

Indexed as

anomaly identificationdifferential privacyoutlier analysisoutlier detectionsensitive privacy

Identifiers

PMID37974954
PMCPMC10651053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.