ArticleIEEE sensors journal2021
Nanomaterials-Based Biosensors for COVID-19 Detection-A Review.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emerging Trends of Gold Nanostructures for Point-of-Care Biosensor-Based Detection of COVID-19.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Review
- Nano-based techniques: A revolutionary approach to prevent covid-19 and enhancing human awareness.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2023Review
- Recent trends in carbon nanotube (CNT)-based biosensors for the fast and sensitive detection of human viruses: a critical review.Nanoscale advances · 2023Review
- Advancement in COVID-19 detection using nanomaterial-based biosensors.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
- Handheld, Low-Cost, Aptamer-Based Sensing Device for Rapid SARS-CoV-2 RNA Detection Using Novelly Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles.IEEE sensors journal · 2022Article
- An Optical Modeling Framework for Coronavirus Detection Using Graphene-Based Nanosensor.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Forecasting the Post-Pandemic Effects of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Using the Bullwhip Phenomenon Alongside Use of Nanosensors for Disease Containment and Cure.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Coupled Multiphysics Modelling of Sensors for Chemical, Biomedical, and Environmental Applications with Focus on Smart Materials and Low-Dimensional Nanostructures.Chemosensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Rapid diagnosis of COVID-19RSC advances · 2022Review
- Fast, accurate, point-of-care COVID-19 pandemic diagnosis enabled through advanced lab-on-chip optical biosensors: Opportunities and challenges.Applied physics reviews · 2021Review
- 2D materials as a diagnostic platform for the detection and sensing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus: a bird's-eye view.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2021Review
- Impact of COVID-19 on materials science research innovation and related pandemic response.MRS bulletin · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review paper discusses the properties of nanomaterials, namely graphene, molybdenum disulfide, carbon nanotubes, and quantum dots for unique sensing applications. Based on the specific analyte to be detected and the functionalization techniques that are employed, some noteworthy sensors that have been developed are discussed. Further, biocompatible sensors fabricated from these materials capable of detecting specific chemical compounds are also highlighted for COVID-19 detection purposes, which can aid in efficient and reliable sensing as well as timely diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.