Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974774›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2023

Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Rhinoplasty Surgery; Risks and Benefits.

Ali Faghih Habibi, Ali Ashraf, Zahra Ghanavi, Maryam Shakiba, Shadman Nemati, Vahid Aghsaghloo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali Faghih HabibiOtorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Amiralmomenin Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Ali AshrafClinical Research Development Unit of Poursina Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Zahra GhanaviDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maryam ShakibaDepartment of Biostatics & Epidemiology, School of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Shadman NematiOtorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Amiralmomenin Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Vahid AghsaghlooOtorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Amiralmomenin Hospital, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Guilan University of Medical Sciences · IRShiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on surgical field bleeding and its respiratory and hemodynamic consequences in rhinoplasty surgeries. Materials and methods: This single-blind clinical trial performed in Amir Al-Momenin university Hospital in 2018. Seventy cases of rhinoplasty surgery patients Enrolled and were randomized into two groups; intervention (PEEP = 5) and comparison group (PEEP = 0). Surgical field bleeding and arterial oxygen saturation pulmonary dynamics and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated during operation and in post anesthesia care unit. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using descriptive and analytical statistics. Results: PEEP applying had no negative effect on surgical bleeding as well as surgeon satisfaction, heart rate and blood pressure were similar in two groups. Pulmonary dynamics and oxygenation were stable and within normal values in all cases. The mean peak airway pressure was 17.87 ± 2.24 in the PEEP group and 16.08 ± 3.37 in the ZEEP group (P = 0.029). Conclusion: applying low level PEEP during anesthesia improved recovery oxygen saturation but had no negative effects on the patient`s hemodynamics, and did not aggravate bleeding and visual clarity. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03854-7.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPEEPRhinoplastyRhinoplasty Surgery

Identifiers

PMID37974774
PMCPMC10645805
OpenAlexW4376873516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.