Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974718›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2023

Comparative Evaluation of Nasolabial Flap, Buccal Fat Pad and Platysma Myocutaneous Flap for Reconstruction of Oral Sub Mucous Fibrosis Defects.

Akhilesh Kumar Singh, Rathindra Nath Bera, J F Neville, Richik Tripathi, Naresh Kumar Sharma, Jananni Anand Kumar, Mehul Shashikant Hirani, Nishtha Chauhan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akhilesh Kumar SinghOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Rathindra Nath BeraOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.ORCID 0000-0002-4390-3213
J F NevilleDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Richik TripathiOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Naresh Kumar SharmaOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Jananni Anand KumarOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Mehul Shashikant HiraniOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.
Nishtha ChauhanOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moderately advanced (stage III) and advanced (stage IV a & b) OSMF requires surgical intervention for management A number of options are available for reconstruction of post OSMF oral cavity defects. In our study we retrospectively compared buccal fat pad, nasolabial flap and platysma flap for reconstruction of the buccal mucosal defects. Patient records were obtained from the medical records section of the Institute and divided into three groups; group A (buccal fat pad), group B (nasolabial group) and group C (platysma flap). Maximal mouth opening and intercommisural distance were the primary outcomes. Kruskal Wallis test was used to test the mean difference between three groups. Mann-Whitney test was used for intergroup comparisons. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to evaluate the mean difference in outcomes at each follow up interval. A

Indexed as

Buccal fat padNasolabial flapOral cavity reconstructionOral submucous fibrosisPlatysma flap

Identifiers

PMID37974718
PMCPMC10646138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.