Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974671›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2023

Efficacy of Normal Saline Nasal Spray Added to Standard Treatment Regimen of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Anubhuti Janwade, Prashant H Patil, Nitin R Ankle, Basavaraj P Belaldavar, Priti S Hajare, Keerthana Veenish U O

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anubhuti JanwadeDepartment of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, J. N. Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka India.ORCID 0009-0001-9861-6393
Prashant H PatilDepartment of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, J. N. Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka India.
Nitin R AnkleDepartment of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, J. N. Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka India.
Basavaraj P BelaldavarDepartment of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, J. N. Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka India.
Priti S HajareDepartment of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, J. N. Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka India.
Keerthana Veenish U ODepartment of ENT and Head & Neck Surgery, J. N. Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka India.
KLE University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Rhinosinusitis is characterized by inflammation of lining of nose and paranasal sinuses leading to nasal blockage/discharge, facial pressure/pain and loss of smell sensation, generally treated with medical therapy initially. Nasal saline irrigation is one of the treatment modalities commonly used to improve symptoms. The aim was to evaluate efficacy of adding normal saline nasal spray to standard treatment regimen of chronic rhinosinusitis. A randomized, controlled, single blinded study with 40 chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Study group was prescribed Normal Saline nasal spray (1 puff in each nostril, thrice daily) along with topical corticosteroids (Mometasone furoate nasal spray, 1 puff in each nostril, twice daily; 1 puff = 50 µg), and oral antibiotics (Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid, 30 mg/kg, twice daily), and the control group was only prescribed topical corticosteroids and oral antibiotics. Patients were evaluated using Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test before and after treatment. There was a significant improvement in LKES, with pre-treatment and post-treatment scores for control group being 5.35 ± 2.43 vs 3.70 ± 1.95 respectively (

Indexed as

Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scoreNasal irrigationNormal salineRhinosinusitisSNOT-22

Identifiers

PMID37974671
PMCPMC10645992
OpenAlexW4382401901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.