ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2023
Cross-module switching diversity of brain network nodes in resting and cognitive states.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Damage Resistance of an fMRI-Spiking Neural Network Based on Speech Recognition Against Stochastic Attack.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale brain network dynamics reflect state change in brain activities and have potential effects on cognition. Such dynamics can be described by node temporal switching between modules; however, there are only a few studies on the influence of brain network node switching on brain cognition. Based on the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data of resting and task states, we constructed dynamic functional networks using overlap sliding-time windows and applied multilayer network analysis to study the behaviours of nodes across brain modules. We found that (i) nodes with a high level switching rate in the resting-state mainly come from the default network, while nodes with a low level of switching rate mainly come from the visual network, (ii) nodes with a high switching rate have lower clustering coefficients and shorter characteristic path lengths, which are mainly affected by the somatomotor network and dorsal attention network; and (iii) in task states, there is still a negative correlation between switching rate, clustering coefficient and characteristic path length. However, the main subsystems that affect brain functions are regulated by the tasks. Our findings not only reveal the relevant characteristics of network node switching behaviours but also provide new insights for further understanding the complex functions of the brain. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-022-09894-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.