Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974447›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2024

Evaluating dietary restriction as a maintaining factor in binge-eating disorder.

Julia Bartholomay, Lauren M Schaefer, Glen Forester, Ross D Crosby, Carol B Peterson, Scott J Crow, Scott G Engel, Stephen A Wonderlich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Dietary Restraint Fallacy.The International journal of eating disorders · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julia BartholomayCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Lauren M SchaeferCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-7598
Glen ForesterCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1738-7163
Ross D CrosbyCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9131-1629
Carol B PetersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9152-4552
Scott J CrowDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1827-5075
Scott G EngelCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Stephen A WonderlichCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0659-153X

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI WONDERLICH, STEPHEN ARTHUR · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
1/2-Integrative Cognitive Affective Therapy for Binge Eating DisorderR34MH099040 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PETERSON, CAROL B. · 2013 to 2015
$684k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099040NIMH NIH HHS R34MH099040NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProminent theories of binge-eating (BE) maintenance highlight dietary restriction as a key precipitant of BE episodes. Consequently, treatment approaches for eating disorders (including binge-eating disorder; BED) seek to reduce dietary restriction in order to improve BE symptoms. The present study tested the hypothesis that dietary restriction promotes BE among 112 individuals with BED.

methodsParticipants completed a 7-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) protocol before and after completing 17 weeks of either Integrative Cognitive-Affective Therapy or guided self-help cognitive behavioral therapy. Analyses examined whether dietary restriction on 1 day of the baseline EMA protocol predicted risk for BE later that same day, and on the following day. Changes in dietary restriction over the course of treatment were also evaluated as a predictor of change in BE from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Baseline dietary restraint was examined as a moderator of the above associations.

resultsDietary restriction did not predict BE later the same day, and changes in restriction were not related to changes in BE across treatment, regardless of baseline dietary restraint levels. Restriction on 1 day did predict increased BE risk on the following day for individuals with higher levels of dietary restraint, but not those with lower levels. DISCUSSION: These findings challenge the assumption that dietary restriction maintains BE among all individuals with BED. Rather, results suggest that dietary restriction may be largely unrelated to BE maintenance in this population, and that reducing dietary restriction generally does not have the intended effect on BE frequency.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderCognitive Behavioral TherapyEcological Momentary AssessmentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomebinge‐eating disorderdietary restraintdietary restrictionecological momentary assessmentEMAtreatment trial

Identifiers

PMID37974447
PMCPMC11093702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.