ArticleCancer cell international2023
A novel autoantibody signatures for enhanced clinical diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of novel biomarkers in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- The early diagnostic value of lung cancer autoantibodies and tumor markers in lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Autoantibody-Based Models for the Diagnosis and Activity Assessment of Takayasu Arteritis.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Humoral immunity in pancreatic cancer: B-cell heterogeneity, regulatory networks, and therapeutic opportunities.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- The Overlooked Autoantibody Repertoire: Exploring the Biomarker Potential of Downregulated Autoantibodies in NSCLC.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Beyond the tumor: Enhancing pancreatic cancer therapy through glutamine metabolism and innovative drug delivery.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2025Review
- Development of high-titer class-switched antibody responses to phosphorylated amino acids is prevalent in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective Markov model analysis from China.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- ESCCPred: a machine learning model for diagnostic prediction of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using autoantibody profiles.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Secretome Analysis Using Affinity Proteomics and Immunoassays: A Focus on Tumor Biology.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease that requires precise diagnosis for effective treatment. However, the diagnostic value of carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9 (CA19-9) is limited. Therefore, this study aims to identify novel tumor-associated autoantibodies (TAAbs) for PDAC diagnosis.
methodsA three-phase strategy comprising discovery, test, and validation was implemented. HuProt™ Human Proteome Microarray v3.1 was used to screen potential TAAbs in 49 samples. Subsequently, the levels of potential TAAbs were evaluated in 477 samples via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in PDAC, benign pancreatic diseases (BPD), and normal control (NC), followed by the construction of a diagnostic model.
resultsIn the discovery phase, protein microarrays identified 167 candidate TAAbs. Based on bioinformatics analysis, fifteen tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) were selected for further validation using ELISA. Ten TAAbs exhibited differentially expressed in PDAC patients in the test phase (P < 0.05), with an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.61 to 0.76. An immunodiagnostic model including three TAAbs (anti-HEXB, anti-TXLNA, anti-SLAMF6) was then developed, demonstrating AUCs of 0.81 (58.0% sensitivity, 86.0% specificity) and 0.78 (55.71% sensitivity, 87.14% specificity) for distinguishing PDAC from NC. Additionally, the model yielded AUCs of 0.80 (58.0% sensitivity, 86.25% specificity) and 0.83 (55.71% sensitivity, 100% specificity) for distinguishing PDAC from BPD in the test and validation phases, respectively. Notably, the combination of the immunodiagnostic model with CA19-9 resulted in an increased positive rate of PDAC to 92.91%.
conclusionThe immunodiagnostic model may offer a novel serological detection method for PDAC diagnosis, providing valuable insights into the development of effective diagnostic biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.