Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974150›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2023

A Bayesian maximum entropy model for predicting tsetse ecological distributions.

Lani Fox, Brad G Peter, April N Frake, Joseph P Messina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lani FoxLani Fox Geostatistical Consulting, Claremont, CA, USA. lanicfox@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3737-6506
Brad G PeterDepartment of Geosciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-4482
April N FrakeCenter for Global Change and Earth Observation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9875-9140
Joseph P MessinaDepartment of Geography, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1978-0778
Michigan Public Health Institute · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Dynamic Ecological Simulation Model of Tsetse Transmitted Trypanosomosis in KenyaR21GM084704 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MESSINA, JOSEPH P · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM084704NIGMS NIH HHS RGM084704ANIH HHS RGM084704A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfrican trypanosomiasis is a tsetse-borne parasitic infection that affects humans, wildlife, and domesticated animals. Tsetse flies are endemic to much of Sub-Saharan Africa and a spatial and temporal understanding of tsetse habitat can aid surveillance and support disease risk management. Problematically, current fine spatial resolution remote sensing data are delivered with a temporal lag and are relatively coarse temporal resolution (e.g., 16 days), which results in disease control models often targeting incorrect places. The goal of this study was to devise a heuristic for identifying tsetse habitat (at a fine spatial resolution) into the future and in the temporal gaps where remote sensing and proximal data fail to supply information.

methodsThis paper introduces a generalizable and scalable open-access version of the tsetse ecological distribution (TED) model used to predict tsetse distributions across space and time, and contributes a geospatial Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME) prediction model trained by TED output data to forecast where, herein the Morsitans group of tsetse, persist in Kenya, a method that mitigates the temporal lag problem. This model facilitates identification of tsetse habitat and provides critical information to control tsetse, mitigate the impact of trypanosomiasis on vulnerable human and animal populations, and guide disease minimization in places with ephemeral tsetse. Moreover, this BME analysis is one of the first to utilize cluster and parallel computing along with a Monte Carlo analysis to optimize BME computations. This allows for the analysis of an exceptionally large dataset (over 2 billion data points) at a finer resolution and larger spatiotemporal scale than what had previously been possible.

resultsUnder the most conservative assessment for Kenya, the BME kriging analysis showed an overall prediction accuracy of 74.8% (limited to the maximum suitability extent). In predicting tsetse distribution outcomes for the entire country the BME kriging analysis was 97% accurate in its forecasts.

conclusionsThis work offers a solution to the persistent temporal data gap in accurate and spatially precise rainfall predictions and the delayed processing of remotely sensed data collectively in the - 45 days past to + 180 days future temporal window. As is shown here, the BME model is a reliable alternative for forecasting future tsetse distributions to allow preplanning for tsetse control. Furthermore, this model provides guidance on disease control that would otherwise not be available. These 'big data' BME methods are particularly useful for large domain studies. Considering that past BME studies required reduction of the spatiotemporal grid to facilitate analysis. Both the GEE-TED and the BME libraries have been made open source to enable reproducibility and offer continual updates into the future as new remotely sensed data become available.

Indexed as

Trypanosomiasis, AfricanTsetse FliesAnimalsBayes TheoremEntropyHumansReproducibility of ResultsBayesian maximum entropyGeospatial modelingGoogle Earth EngineKrigingMitigationTsetse

Identifiers

PMID37974150
PMCPMC10655428
OpenAlexW4388730026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.