Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974069›Full record

ArticleBMC immunology2023

Long-term humoral and cellular immunity after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection: a 20-month longitudinal study.

Astrid Korning Hvidt, Huaijian Guo, Rebecca Andersen, Stine Sofie Frank Lende, Line Khalidan Vibholm, Ole Schmeltz Søgaard, Marianne Hoegsbjerg Schleimann, Victoria Russell, Angela Man-Wei Cheung, Eustache Paramithiotis and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cellular Immunological Memory T Cells andDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Astrid Korning HvidtDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Huaijian GuoCellCarta, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Rebecca AndersenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Stine Sofie Frank LendeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Line Khalidan VibholmDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ole Schmeltz SøgaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Marianne Hoegsbjerg SchleimannDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Victoria RussellToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Angela Man-Wei CheungToronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Eustache ParamithiotisCellCarta, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Rikke OlesenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. rikkol@rm.dk.
Martin TolstrupDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

The Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF21SA0069154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2 remains a world-wide health issue. SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity is induced upon both infection and vaccination. However, defining the long-term immune trajectory, especially after infection, is limited. In this study, we aimed to further the understanding of long-term SARS-CoV-2-specific immune response after infection.

resultsWe conducted a longitudinal cohort study among 93 SARS-CoV-2 recovered individuals. Immune responses were continuously monitored for up to 20 months after infection. The humoral responses were quantified by Spike- and Nucleocapsid-specific IgG levels. T cell responses to Spike- and non-Spike epitopes were examined using both intercellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay and Activation-Induced marker (AIM) assay with quantification of antigen-specific IFNγ production. During the 20 months follow-up period, Nucleocapsid-specific antibody levels and non-Spike-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cell frequencies decreased in the blood. However, a majority of participants maintained a durable immune responses 20 months after infection: 59% of the participants were seropositive for Nucleocapsid-specific IgG, and more than 70% had persisting non-Spike-specific T cells. The Spike-specific response initially decreased but as participants were vaccinated against COVID-19, Spike-specific IgG levels and T cell frequencies were boosted reaching similar or higher levels compared to 1 month post-infection. The trajectory of infection-induced SARS-CoV-2-specific immunity decreases, but for the majority of participants it persists beyond 20 months. The T cell response displays a greater durability. Vaccination boosts Spike-specific immune responses to similar or higher levels as seen after primary infection.

conclusionsFor most participants, the response persists 20 months after infection, and the cellular response appears to be more long-lived compared to the circulating antibody levels. Vaccination boosts the S-specific response but does not affect the non-S-specific response. Together, these findings support the understanding of immune contraction, and with studies showing the immune levels required for protection, adds to the knowledge of durability of protection against future SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, ViralHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, HumoralImmunoglobulin GLongitudinal StudiesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin GAntibodiesAntigen-specific T cellsImmune durabilityInfectionSARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID37974069
PMCPMC10652616
OpenAlexW4388732790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.