Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974018›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Cephalometric landmark detection without X-rays combining coordinate regression and heatmap regression.

Kaisei Takahashi, Yui Shimamura, Chie Tachiki, Yasushi Nishii, Masafumi Hagiwara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kaisei TakahashiDepartment of Information and Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kanagawa, 223-8522, Japan. kaise64taka84@keio.jp.
Yui ShimamuraDepartment of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan.
Chie TachikiDepartment of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan.
Yasushi NishiiDepartment of Orthodontics, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, 101-0061, Japan.
Masafumi HagiwaraDepartment of Information and Computer Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kanagawa, 223-8522, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fully automated techniques using convolutional neural networks for cephalometric landmark detection have recently advanced. However, all existing studies have adopted X-rays. The problem of direct exposure of patients to X-ray radiation remains unsolved. We propose a model for detecting cephalometric landmarks using only facial profile images without X-rays. First, the model estimates the landmark coordinates using the features of facial profile images through high-resolution representation learning. Second, considering the spatial relationship of the landmarks, the model refines the estimated coordinates. The estimated coordinates are input into fully connected networks to improve the accuracy. During the experiment, a total of 2000 facial profile images collected from 2000 female patients were used. Experiments results suggested that the proposed method may perform at a level equal to or potentially better than existing methods using cephalograms. We obtained an MRE of 0.61 mm for the test data and a mean detection rate of 98.20% within 2 mm. Our proposed two-stage learning method enables a highly accurate estimation of the landmark positions using only facial profile images. The results indicate that X-rays may not be required when detecting cephalometric landmarks.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerCephalometryFemaleHumansRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID37974018
PMCPMC10654665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.