Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37974001›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Sympathetic nervous system responses during complex walking tasks and community ambulation post-stroke.

Kanika Bansal, David J Clark, Emily J Fox, Dorian K Rose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kanika BansalDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Mount Union, 1972, Clark Ave, Alliance, OH, 44601-3993, USA. bansalka@mountunion.edu.
David J ClarkUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Emily J FoxUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Dorian K RoseUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

Rehabilitation Research and Development Service B3336-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke survivors frequently report increased perceived challenge of walking (PCW) in complex environments, restricting their daily ambulation. PCW is conventionally measured through subjective questionnaires or, more recently, through objective quantification of sympathetic nervous system activity during walking tasks. However, how these measurements of PCW reflect daily walking activity post-stroke is unknown. We aimed to compare the subjective and objective assessments of PCW in predicting home and community ambulation. In 29 participants post-stroke, we measured PCW subjectively with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and objectively through electrodermal activity, quantified by change in skin conductance levels (SCL) and skin conductance responses (SCR) between outdoor-complex and indoor-steady-state walking. High-PCW participants were categorized into high-change SCL (ΔSCL ≥ 1.7 μs), high-change SCR (ΔSCR ≥ 0.2 μs) and low ABC (ABC < 72%) groups, while low-PCW participants were categorized into low-change SCL (ΔSCL < 1.7 μs), low-change SCR (ΔSCR < 0.2 μs) and high-ABC (ABC ≥ 72%) groups. Number and location of daily steps were quantified with accelerometry and Global Positioning System devices. Compared to low-change SCL group, the high-change SCL group took fewer steps in home and community (p = 0.04). Neither ABC nor SCR groups differed in home or community steps/day. Objective measurement of PCW via electrodermal sensing more accurately represents home and community ambulation compared to the subjective questionnaire.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingHumansSympathetic Nervous SystemWalking

Identifiers

PMID37974001
PMCPMC10654447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.