Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973978›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Microbial methane cycling in a landfill on a decadal time scale.

Daniel S Grégoire, Nikhil A George, Laura A Hug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel S GrégoireDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. danielgregoire@cunet.carleton.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1109-7333
Nikhil A GeorgeDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-7483-5780
Laura A HugDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. laura.hug@uwaterloo.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landfills generate outsized environmental footprints due to microbial degradation of organic matter in municipal solid waste, which produces the potent greenhouse gas methane. With global solid waste production predicted to increase substantially in the next few decades, there is a pressing need to better understand the temporal dynamics of biogeochemical processes that control methane cycling in landfills. Here, we use metagenomic approaches to characterize microbial methane cycling in waste that was landfilled over 39 years. Our analyses indicate that newer waste supports more diverse communities with similar composition compared to older waste, which contains lower diversity and more varied communities. Older waste contains primarily autotrophic organisms with versatile redox metabolisms, whereas newer waste is dominated by anaerobic fermenters. Methane-producing microbes are more abundant, diverse, and metabolically versatile in new waste compared to old waste. Our findings indicate that predictive models for methane emission in landfills overlook methane oxidation in the absence of oxygen, as well as certain microbial lineages that can potentially contribute to methane sinks in diverse habitats.

Indexed as

MethaneSolid WasteEcosystemOxidation-ReductionWaste Disposal FacilitiesMethaneSolid Waste

Identifiers

PMID37973978
PMCPMC10654671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.