ArticleScientific reports2023
The efficacy and safety of multi-loop traction device for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a single center prospective pilot study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unidirectional versus direction-selectable traction device in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Innovations in Advanced Endoscopic Resection of Early Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Usefulness of the anchor traction method for multi-point traction in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective, single-centre study (with video).Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Different endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques: a tailored approach.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Review
- Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the USA: The current state and future perspectives.DEN open · 2025Review
- Article
- Development of a novel multipoint traction device for gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and evaluation of its efficacy and safety.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used, the degree of difficulty varies greatly depending on the lesion. Since the multi-loop traction device (MLTD) has been suggested to shorten the procedure time in colorectal ESD, we examined the efficacy and safety of using the MLTD in gastric ESD. Thirty patients with gastric neoplasms were prospectively enrolled from February 2022 to December 2022, and the outcomes of ESD with the MLTD were evaluated. The primary outcomes were procedure time and dissection speed. The secondary outcomes were en bloc and R0 resection rates, MLTD attachment time, and complications of ESD with the MLTD. After excluding 1 patient, 29 patients (29 lesions) were treated by ESD with the MLTD. The median procedure time was 26 min (range, 9-210 min), and the median submucosal dissection speed was 39.9 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.