Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973919›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023

A study of generative large language model for medical research and healthcare.

Cheng Peng, Xi Yang, Aokun Chen, Kaleb E Smith, Nima PourNejatian, Anthony B Costa, Cheryl Martin, Mona G Flores, Ying Zhang, Tanja Magoc and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 160 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
160citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

160 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

100 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Cheng PengDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1994-893X
Xi YangDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Aokun ChenDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kaleb E SmithNVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Nima PourNejatianNVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Anthony B CostaNVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Cheryl MartinNVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Mona G FloresNVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7362-3044
Ying ZhangResearch Computing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4210-2104
Tanja MagocIntegrated Data Repository Research Services, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Gloria LiporiIntegrated Data Repository Research Services, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5616-2701
Duane A MitchellLillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6049-213X
Naykky S OspinaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Mustafa M AhmedDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
William R HoganDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9881-1017
Elizabeth A ShenkmanDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-1804
Yi GuoDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0587-4105
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2238-5429
Yonghui WuDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. yonghui.wu@ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6780-6135

Funding

Disparities of Alzheimer's disease progression in Sexual Minority IndividualsR01AG080624 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Jiang Bian, Yi Guo · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
The benefits and harms of lung cancer screening in FloridaR01CA246418 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, GUO, YI · 2020 to 2023
$1.7M
Advancing Drug Repositioning for Alzheimer’s Disease using Real-world DataR56AG069880 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BIAN, JIANG, CHEN, YONG · 2021 to 2022
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246418NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080624NIA NIH HHS R56 AG069880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are enormous enthusiasm and concerns in applying large language models (LLMs) to healthcare. Yet current assumptions are based on general-purpose LLMs such as ChatGPT, which are not developed for medical use. This study develops a generative clinical LLM, GatorTronGPT, using 277 billion words of text including (1) 82 billion words of clinical text from 126 clinical departments and approximately 2 million patients at the University of Florida Health and (2) 195 billion words of diverse general English text. We train GatorTronGPT using a GPT-3 architecture with up to 20 billion parameters and evaluate its utility for biomedical natural language processing (NLP) and healthcare text generation. GatorTronGPT improves biomedical natural language processing. We apply GatorTronGPT to generate 20 billion words of synthetic text. Synthetic NLP models trained using synthetic text generated by GatorTronGPT outperform models trained using real-world clinical text. Physicians' Turing test using 1 (worst) to 9 (best) scale shows that there are no significant differences in linguistic readability (p = 0.22; 6.57 of GatorTronGPT compared with 6.93 of human) and clinical relevance (p = 0.91; 7.0 of GatorTronGPT compared with 6.97 of human) and that physicians cannot differentiate them (p < 0.001). This study provides insights into the opportunities and challenges of LLMs for medical research and healthcare.

Identifiers

PMID37973919
PMCPMC10654385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.