Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973827›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2024

The unequal effects of the health-economy trade-off during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Marco Pangallo, Alberto Aleta, R Maria Del Rio-Chanona, Anton Pichler, David Martín-Corral, Matteo Chinazzi, François Lafond, Marco Ajelli, Esteban Moro, Yamir Moreno and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Notes from Self-Isolation: Imagination in Times of Ruptures.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Endogenous labour flow networks.EPJ data science · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marco PangalloCENTAI Institute, Turin, Italy. marco.pangallo@centai.eu.ORCID 0000-0001-9966-1674
Alberto AletaInstitute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems and Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1192-8707
R Maria Del Rio-ChanonaComplexity Science Hub, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0189-7919
Anton PichlerComplexity Science Hub, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7522-1532
David Martín-CorralDepartment of Mathematics and GISC, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8896-0599
Matteo ChinazziMOBS Lab, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5955-1929
François LafondInstitute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, and Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8333-561X
Marco AjelliLaboratory for Computational Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1753-4749
Esteban MoroDepartment of Mathematics and GISC, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Leganes, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2894-1024
Yamir MorenoCENTAI Institute, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-1893
Alessandro VespignaniMOBS Lab, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3419-4205
J Doyne FarmerInstitute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, and Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

RFA-IP-20-003, FluMod - Center for the Multiscale Modeling of Pandemic and seasonal Flu Prevention and ControlU01IP001137 · IP · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI VESPIGNANI, ALESSANDRO · 2020 to 2024
$3.4M
NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP001137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the question of whether mandated interventions have similar economic and public health effects as spontaneous behavioural change remains unresolved. Addressing this question, and understanding differential effects across socioeconomic groups, requires building quantitative and fine-grained mechanistic models. Here we introduce a data-driven, granular, agent-based model that simulates epidemic and economic outcomes across industries, occupations and income levels. We validate the model by reproducing key outcomes of the first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 in the New York metropolitan area. The key mechanism coupling the epidemic and economic modules is the reduction in consumption due to fear of infection. In counterfactual experiments, we show that a similar trade-off between epidemic and economic outcomes exists both when individuals change their behaviour due to fear of infection and when non-pharmaceutical interventions are imposed. Low-income workers, who perform in-person occupations in customer-facing industries, face the strongest trade-off.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansNew YorkOccupationsPandemicsPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID37973827
PMCPMC10896714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.