Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973817›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023

Development and prospective validation of postoperative pain prediction from preoperative EHR data using attention-based set embeddings.

Ran Liu, Rodrigo Gutiérrez, Rory V Mather, Tom A D Stone, Laura A Santa Cruz Mercado, Kishore Bharadwaj, Jasmine Johnson, Proloy Das, Gustavo Balanza, Ekenedilichukwu Uwanaka and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ran Liu *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-9281
Rodrigo Gutiérrez *Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rory V MatherDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Tom A D StoneDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-6092
Laura A Santa Cruz MercadoDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7886-480X
Kishore BharadwajDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1308-8596
Jasmine JohnsonDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Proloy DasDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Gustavo BalanzaDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-3607
Ekenedilichukwu UwanakaDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8490-6750
Justin SydloskiDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8162-5988
Andrew ChenDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Mackenzie HagoodDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Edward A BittnerDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Patrick L PurdonDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. ppurdon@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0080-3340
Harvard University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM144273 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI David Shumway Jones, Jacqueline A. Lees · 2022 to 2026
$14.7M
Developing novel technologies to monitor nociception and opioid administration during surgery and general anesthesia to minimize postoperative opioid requirementsR42DA053075 · NIDA · PASCALL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED · PI LE MAU, TUAN, PURDON, PATRICK L. · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
Characterizing brain dynamic biomarkers of fentanyl using intracranial and high-density electroencephalogram in humansR01DA056593 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Patrick L. Purdon · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
A pilot study to characterize brain dynamic biomarkers of fentanyl for opioid overdose monitoringR21DA048323 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PURDON, PATRICK L. · 2019 to 2020
$462k
Model-based optimization of pain management in surgical patientsF32GM148114 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, RAN · 2022 to 2024
$210k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA056593NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA048323NIDA NIH HHS R42 DA053075NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM148114NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM144273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preoperative knowledge of expected postoperative pain can help guide perioperative pain management and focus interventions on patients with the greatest risk of acute pain. However, current methods for predicting postoperative pain require patient and clinician input or laborious manual chart review and often do not achieve sufficient performance. We use routinely collected electronic health record data from a multicenter dataset of 234,274 adult non-cardiac surgical patients to develop a machine learning method which predicts maximum pain scores on the day of surgery and four subsequent days and validate this method in a prospective cohort. Our method, POPS, is fully automated and relies only on data available prior to surgery, allowing application in all patients scheduled for or considering surgery. Here we report that POPS achieves state-of-the-art performance and outperforms clinician predictions on all postoperative days when predicting maximum pain on the 0-10 NRS in prospective validation, though with degraded calibration. POPS is interpretable, identifying comorbidities that significantly contribute to postoperative pain based on patient-specific context, which can assist clinicians in mitigating cases of acute pain.

Identifiers

PMID37973817
PMCPMC10654400
OpenAlexW4388730556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.