Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973792›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2023

Scars.

Marc G Jeschke, Fiona M Wood, Esther Middelkoop, Ardeshir Bayat, Luc Teot, Rei Ogawa, Gerd G Gauglitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
45.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Indications for the use of dermal substitutes in patients with acute burns and in reconstructive surgery after burns: A systematic review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A CD14-Targeting In Situ Hydrogel Directs Macrophage Reprogramming to Minimize Scar Formation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Multi-Axis Stretchable Zippers for Personalized Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Marc G JeschkeHamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. marc.jeschke@hhsc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-1664
Fiona M WoodBurns Service of Western Australia, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5427-6588
Esther MiddelkoopBurn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8843-1080
Ardeshir BayatMedical Research Council Wound Healing Unit, Hair and Skin Research Lab, Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town & Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Luc TeotDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Burns, Wound Healing, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Rei OgawaDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Gerd G GauglitzDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Association of Dutch Burn Centres · NLHamilton Health Sciences · CAHaut- und Lasercentrum Potsdam · DENippon Medical School · JPThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversité de Montpellier · FRUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing occurs as a response to disruption of the epidermis and dermis. It is an intricate and well-orchestrated response with the goal to restore skin integrity and function. However, in hundreds of millions of patients, skin wound healing results in abnormal scarring, including keloid lesions or hypertrophic scarring. Although the underlying mechanisms of hypertrophic scars and keloid lesions are not well defined, evidence suggests that the changes in the extracellular matrix are perpetuated by ongoing inflammation in susceptible individuals, resulting in a fibrotic phenotype. The lesions then become established, with ongoing deposition of excess disordered collagen. Not only can abnormal scarring be debilitating and painful, it can also cause functional impairment and profound changes in appearance, thereby substantially affecting patients' lives. Despite the vast demand on patient health and the medical society, very little progress has been made in the care of patients with abnormal scarring. To improve the outcome of pathological scarring, standardized and innovative approaches are required.

Indexed as

Cicatrix, HypertrophicKeloidFibrosisHumansSkinWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID37973792
OpenAlexW4388731398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.