Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973702›Full record

ReviewAmbio2024

Farmland biodiversity monitoring through citizen science: A review of existing approaches and future opportunities.

Andy Ruck, René van der Wal, Amelia S C Hood, Alice L Mauchline, Simon G Potts, Michiel F WallisDeVries, Erik Öckinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ambio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andy RuckDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. andyruck84@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1892-8205
René van der WalDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
Amelia S C HoodSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6EU, UK.
Alice L MauchlineSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6EU, UK.
Simon G PottsSchool of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6EU, UK.
Michiel F WallisDeVriesDe Vlinderstichting/Dutch Butterfly Conservation, P.O. Box 506, 6700AM, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Erik ÖckingerDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Horizon 2020 862480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes is important for assessing the effects of both land use change and activities that influence farmland biodiversity. Despite a considerable increase in citizen science approaches to biodiversity monitoring in recent decades, their potential in farmland-specific contexts has not been systematically examined. This paper therefore provides a comprehensive review of existing citizen science approaches involving biodiversity monitoring on farmland. Using three complementary methods, we identify a range of programmes at least partially covering farmland. From these, we develop a typology of eight programme types, reflecting distinctions in types of data collected and nature of volunteer involvement, and highlight their respective strengths and limitations. While all eight types can make substantial contributions to farmland biodiversity monitoring, there is considerable scope for their further development-particularly through increased engagement of farmers, for whom receiving feedback on the effects of their own practices could help facilitate adaptive management.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceAgricultureBiodiversityFarmersFarmsHumansAgricultural landscapesBiodiversity monitoringCitizen scienceFarmer engagementReviewTypology

Identifiers

PMID37973702
PMCPMC10774504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.