Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973686›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2024

The Japanese breast cancer society clinical practice guidelines for breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 2022 edition.

Kazunori Kubota, Kazutaka Nakashima, Kazuaki Nakashima, Masako Kataoka, Kenich Inoue, Mariko Goto, Chizuko Kanbayashi, Koichi Hirokaga, Ken Yamaguchi, Akihiko Suzuki

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Key issues in surveillance of secondary breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Kazunori KubotaDepartment of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minami-koshigaya, Koshigaya, Saitama, 343-8555, Japan. kubotard@dokkyomed.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-4910
Kazutaka NakashimaDepartment of General Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School General Medical Center, Okayama, Japan.
Kazuaki NakashimaThe Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan.
Masako KataokaThe Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenich InoueThe Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko GotoThe Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan.
Chizuko KanbayashiThe Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Subcommittee, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi HirokagaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan.
Ken YamaguchiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Akihiko SuzukiDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan.
Kawasaki Medical School · JPDokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPHyogo Prefectural Cancer Center · JPJapan Cancer Society · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPKyoto University · JPNiigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPSaga University · JPTohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides updates to readers based on the newly published Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 2022 Edition. These guidelines incorporate the latest evaluation of evidence from studies of diagnostic accuracy. For each clinical question, outcomes for benefits and harms were established, and qualitative or quantitative systematic reviews were conducted. Recommendations were determined through voting by a multidisciplinary group, and guidelines were documented to facilitate shared decision-making among patients and medical professionals. The guidelines address screening, surveillance, and pre- and postoperative diagnosis of breast cancer. In an environment that demands an integrated approach, decisions are needed on how to utilize modalities, such as mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and PET/CT. Additionally, it is vital to understand the appropriate use of new technologies, such as tomosynthesis, elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and to consider how best to adapt these methods for individual patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansJapanMammographyMass ScreeningPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyBreast cancer diagnosisBreast cancer screeningBreast cancer surveillanceClinical practice guidelinesJapanese breast cancer society

Identifiers

PMID37973686
PMCPMC10901949
OpenAlexW4388728743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.