Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973682›Full record

ReviewLung2023

Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: Delving into Epidemiology, Genomic and Immune Landscape, Prognosis, Treatment, and Screening.

Ayse Ece Cali Daylan, Emily Miao, Kevin Tang, Grace Chiu, Haiying Cheng

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Breathing carcinogens: PMJournal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayse Ece Cali DaylanDepartment of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1237-0132
Emily MiaoDepartment of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Kevin TangDepartment of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Grace ChiuScarsdale High School, Scarsdale, NY, USA.
Haiying ChengDepartment of Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. hcheng@montefiore.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer in never smokers (LCINS) represents a growing and distinct entity within the broader landscape of lung malignancies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of LCINS, encompassing its epidemiologic trends, risk factors, distinct genomic alterations, clinical outcomes and the ongoing initiative aimed at formulating screening guidelines tailored to this unique population. As LCINS continues to gain prominence, understanding its intricate genomic landscape has become pivotal for tailoring effective therapeutic strategies. Moreover, LCINS does not meet the criteria for lung cancer screening as per the current guidelines. Hence, there is an urgent need to explore its heterogeneity in order to devise optimal screening guidelines conducive to early-stage detection. This review underscores the vital importance of detailed research to elucidate the multifaceted nature of LCINS, with the potential to shape future clinical management and screening recommendations for this unique and growing patient cohort.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerGenomicsHumansPrognosisSmokersGenomic landscapeLung cancerNever smokerNSCLCSCLCScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.