Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973631›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Weakly supervised deep learning for diagnosis of multiple vertebral compression fractures in CT.

Euijoon Choi, Doohyun Park, Geonhui Son, Seongwon Bak, Taejoon Eo, Daemyung Youn, Dosik Hwang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Euijoon ChoiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Doohyun ParkSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Geonhui SonSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seongwon BakVuno Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Taejoon EoSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Daemyung YounSchool of Management of Technology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dosik HwangSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. dosik.hwang@yonsei.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2217-2837
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to develop a weakly supervised deep learning (DL) model for vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture (VCF) classification using image-level labelled data.

methodsThe training set included 815 patients with normal (n = 507, 62%) or VCFs (n = 308, 38%). Our proposed model was trained on image-level labelled data for vertebral-level classification. Another supervised DL model was trained with vertebral-level labelled data to compare the performance of the proposed model.

resultsThe test set included 227 patients with normal (n = 117, 52%) or VCFs (n = 110, 48%). For a fair comparison of the two models, we compared sensitivities with the same specificities of the proposed model and the vertebral-level supervised model. The specificity for overall L1-L5 performance was 0.981. The proposed model may outperform the vertebral-level supervised model with sensitivities of 0.770 vs 0.705 (p = 0.080), respectively. For vertebral-level analysis, the specificities for each L1-L5 were 0.974, 0.973, 0.970, 0.991, and 0.995, respectively. The proposed model yielded the same or better sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model in L1 (0.750 vs 0.694, p = 0.480), L3 (0.793 vs 0.586, p < 0.05), L4 (0.833 vs 0.667, p = 0.480), and L5 (0.600 vs 0.600, p = 1.000), respectively. The proposed model showed lower sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model for L2, but there was no significant difference (0.775 vs 0.825, p = 0.617).

conclusionsThe proposed model may have a comparable or better performance than the supervised model in vertebral-level VCF classification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture classification aids in devising patient-specific treatment plans by identifying the precise vertebrae affected by compression fractures. KEY POINTS: • Our proposed weakly supervised method may have comparable or better performance than the supervised method for vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture classification. • The weakly supervised model could have classified cases with multiple vertebral compression fractures at the vertebral-level, even if the model was trained with image-level labels. • Our proposed method could help reduce radiologists' labour because it enables vertebral-level classification from image-level labels.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFractures, CompressionSensitivity and SpecificitySpinal FracturesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSupervised Machine LearningClassificationDeep learningFractures (Compression)Spine

Identifiers

PMID37973631
OpenAlexW4388747389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.