ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2023
Impact of a handpiece with a built-in fluidics pressure sensor on phacoemulsification: a multicentre prospective comparative study.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04732351 (Observational Multicenter Registry to Assess the Enefits of Active Sentry Handpiece During Cataract Surgery With the Centurion Phacoemulsifier), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Observational Multicenter Registry to Assess the Enefits of Active Sentry Handpiece During Cataract Surgery With the Centurion Phacoemulsifier (SASCA)
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of Post-Operative Outcomes between IOP-20 and IOP-50 in Phacoemulsification with Active Fluidics System: Randomized Single Blinded Trial.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Trial
- Safety and prognosis of phacoemulsification using active sentry and active fluidics with different IOP settings - a randomized, controlled study.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Trial
- Occlusion break surge performance of a next-generation phacoemulsification system.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Article
- Advances in cataract surgery: is a new era on the horizon?Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Anterior chamber stability of a novel phacoemulsification machine through the slit side view method.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026Article
- Occlusion Break Surge and Anterior Chamber Stability in the Intraocular Environment of Modern Phacoemulsification: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Bench Evaluation of Intraocular Pressure Control with Clinical Assessment of Anterior Chamber Stability of a Dual Peristaltic Phacoemulsification Device.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters between Two Handpieces in One-Handed Phacoemulsification with Active Fluidics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- EVA NEXUS-Phaco performance study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe assessed whether the immediate pressure adjustments provided by a phacoemulsification handpiece with a built-in pressure sensor (Active Sentry, AS) could decrease the amount of energy delivered in the eye during cataract surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Study of Active Sentry in Cataract Surgery was a multicentre prospective clinical trial. The Centurion system (Alcon Labs) was used and we compared phacoemulsifications performed with the AS handpiece with procedures using a sensor placed in the phacoemulsifier (non-AS). The primary outcome measure was the cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) used during the procedures. The secondary outcome measures were the total, longitudinal and torsional ultrasound (US) times, the duration of the surgery and the amount of fluid used during the surgeries.
resultsThe study analysed 1432 (800 AS and 632 non-AS) procedures. The mean patient age was 72.4±10.0 years. The median CDE was respectively 6.3 (IQR 3.5-9.9) and 6.7 (IQR 4.5-11.5) with and without AS (p=0.0001). The median US time was, respectively, 48.0 s (IQR 34.0-68.0) and 55.0 s (IQR 38.0-80.0) with and without AS (p<0.0001). Torsional and longitudinal US times were reduced with AS. The median duration of the procedure was, respectively, 9.0 min (IQR 7.0-12.0) and 10.0 min (IQR 7.0-13.0) (p=0.0002) with and without AS. The median balanced salt solution volume used was 52.0 cm
conclusionThe phacoemulsifications performed with a pressure sensor built in the handpiece delivered less energy in the eye and were shorter. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04732351.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.