Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37973546›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Community perceptions matter: a mixed-methods study using local knowledge to define features of success for a community intervention to improve quality of care for children under-5 in Jigawa, Nigeria.

Agnese Iuliano, Funmilayo Shittu, Timothy Colbourn, Julius Salako, Damola Bakare, Ayobami Adebayo A Bakare, Carina King, Hamish Graham, Eric D McCollum, Adegoke G Falade and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Agnese IulianoUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK a.iuliano@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0766-9658
Funmilayo ShittuDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Timothy ColbournUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Julius SalakoDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Damola BakareDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ayobami Adebayo A BakareDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carina KingUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Hamish GrahamCentre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, MCRI, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2461-0463
Eric D McCollumEudowood Division of Pediatric Respiratory Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Adegoke G FaladeDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Obioma UchenduDepartment of Community Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ibrahim HarunaSave the Children International Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.
Paula ValentineSave the Children, London, UK.
Rochelle BurgessUCL Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9749-7065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, we used the information generated by community members during an intervention design process to understand the features needed for a successful community participatory intervention to improve child health.

designWe conducted a concurrent mixed-methods study (November 2019-March 2020) to inform the design and evaluation of a community-facility linkage participatory intervention.

settingKiyawa Local Government Area (Jigawa State, Nigeria)-population of 230 000 (n=425 villages).

participantsQualitative data included 12 community conversations with caregivers of children under-5 (men, older and younger women; n=9 per group), 3 focus group discussions (n=10) with ward development committee members and interviews with facility heads (n=3). Quantitative data comprised household surveys (n=3464) with compound heads (n=1803) and women (n=1661).

resultsWe analysed qualitative data with thematic network analysis and the surveys with linear regression-results were triangulated in the interpretation phase. Participants identified the following areas of focus: community health education; facility infrastructure, equipment and staff improvements; raising funds to make these changes. Community involvement, cooperation and empowerment were recognised as a strategy to improve child health, and the presence of intermediate bodies (development committees) was deemed important to improve communication and solve problems between community and facility members. The survey showed functional community relations' dynamics, with high levels of internal cohesion (78%), efficacy in solving problems together (79%) and fairness of the local leaders (82%).

conclusionsCombining the results from this study and critical theories on successful participation identified community-informed features for a contextually tailored community-facility link intervention. The need to promote a more inclusive approach to future child health interventions was highlighted. In addition to health education campaigns, the relationship between community and healthcare providers needs strengthening, and development committees were identified as an essential feature for successfully linking communities and facilities for child health. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN39213655.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealth PersonnelChildCommunity ParticipationFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleNigeriaCommunity child healthQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID37973546
PMCPMC10660644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.