SynthesisResuscitation2024
Electroencephalogram-based machine learning models to predict neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Resuscitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of Machine Learning for Patients With Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic utility of the revised post-cardiac arrest syndrome for therapeutic hypothermia score in pediatric patients with post-cardiac arrest syndrome.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Prediction of Neurological Outcome and Mortality in Cardiac Arrest Patients: An Explainable Machine Learning Study Integrating HRV, EEG, and Clinical Features.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Automated Cerebral Edema Detection using Electroencephalography in Post-cardiac Arrest Patients.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- A machine learning framework for multimodal temporal prediction of neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- EEG-based machine-learning prognostication in comatose patients with indeterminate outcome after cardiac arrest.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Automating Critical Care EEG: Enhancing Accuracy, Efficiency, and Patient Outcomes in Critical Care.Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Early prediction of in-hospital acute brain injury following cardiac arrest using machine learning: development and external validation.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- A Bioinspired Multimodal CNN-LSTM Network for EEG Analysis of Patients in Coma.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pediatric cardiac arrest outcome prediction using data-driven machine learning of early quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) features.Resuscitation · 2025Article
- How much information is needed to predict outcomes after cardiac arrest?Resuscitation · 2025Article
- Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aim of the reviewThe primary aim of this systematic review was to investigate the most common electroencephalogram (EEG)-based machine learning (ML) model with the highest Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) in two ML categories, conventional ML and Deep Neural Network (DNN), to predict the neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest; the secondary aim was to investigate common EEG features applied to ML models.
methodsSystematic search of medical literature from PubMed and engineering literature from Compendex up to June 2, 2023. One reviewer screened studies that used EEG-based ML models to predict the neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest. Four reviewers validated that the studies met selection criteria. Nine variables were manually extracted. The top-five common EEG features were calculated. We evaluated each study's risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies guideline.
resultsOut of 351 identified studies, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Random Forest (RF) (n = 7) was the most common ML model in the conventional ML category (n = 11), followed by Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) (n = 4) in the DNN category (n = 6). The AUCs for RF ranged between 0.8 and 0.97, while CNN had AUCs between 0.7 and 0.92. The top-three commonly used EEG features were band power (n = 12), Shannon's Entropy (n = 11), burst-suppression ratio (n = 9).
conclusionsRF and CNN were the two most common ML models with the highest AUCs for predicting the neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest. Using a multimodal model that combines EEG features and electronic health record data may further improve prognostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.