ArticleJCO precision oncology2023
Amplification of Wild-Type
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- RET Signaling Pathway in Human Cancer: Oncogenic Mechanisms, Selective Inhibitors, and Emerging Resistance Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- AccurateInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Effective treatment of non-fusion RET intragenic deletion lung adenocarcinoma with pralsetinib: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Adverse event profiles of selpercatinib: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis based on FAERS database.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose
methodsIn two institutional cohorts of patients with solid cancers from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) whose tumors underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS), the frequency and clinicopathologic features of wild-type
resultsThe frequency of wild-type
conclusionAmplification of wild-type
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.