Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37972233›Full record

ReviewAnalytical chemistry2023

Advancing Evidence-Based Data Interpretation in UV-Vis and Fluorescence Analysis for Nanomaterials: An Analytical Chemistry Perspective.

Max Wamsley, Shengli Zou, Dongmao Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Analytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max WamsleyDepartment of Chemistry, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi 39762, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6790-4846
Shengli ZouDepartment of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1302-133X
Dongmao ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi 39762, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2303-7338

Funding

Zinc dependent conformational changes in AdcR and their impact on DNA bindingP20GM103646 · NIGMS · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI THIBAUDEAU, GISELLE · 2013 to 2022
$21.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

UV-vis spectrophotometry and spectrofluorometry are indispensable tools in education, research, and industrial process controls with widespread applications in nanoscience encompassing diverse nanomaterials and fields. Nevertheless, the prevailing spectroscopic interpretations and analyses often exhibit ambiguity and errors, particularly evident in the nanoscience literature. This analytical chemistry Perspective focuses on fostering evidence-based data interpretation in experimental studies of materials' UV-vis absorption, scattering, and fluorescence properties. We begin by outlining common issues observed in UV-vis and fluorescence analysis. Subsequently, we provide a summary of recent advances in commercial UV-vis spectrophotometric and spectrofluorometric instruments, emphasizing their potential to enhance scientific rigor in UV-vis and fluorescence analysis. Furthermore, we propose potential avenues for future developments in spectroscopic instrumentation and measurement strategies, aiming to further augment the utility of optical spectroscopy in nano research for samples where optical complexity surpasses existing tools. Through a targeted focus on the critical issues related to UV-vis and fluorescence properties of nanomaterials, this Perspective can serve as a valuable resource for researchers, educators, and practitioners.

Identifiers

PMID37972233
PMCPMC12823026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.