ArticlePloS one2023
Demographic and socioeconomic determinants of access to care: A subgroup disparity analysis using new equity-focused measurements.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Socioeconomic status and dental service utilization among children and adolescents: systematic reviews and meta analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Disparity in non-communicable disease burden attributable to ambient PMJournal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic determinants of extreme perinatal outcomes in Spain, 1996-2022.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Barriers and facilitators to accessing healthcare services among elderly people living in a rural Amazonian community, Brazil.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Machine learning methods, applications and economic analysis to predict heart failure hospitalisation risk: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Internet use for health information, health service utilization, and quality of care in the U.S.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- The global burden of osteoarthritis knee: a secondary data analysis of a population-based study.Clinical rheumatology · 2025Article
- Barriers to healthcare access among female youths in Mozambique: a mixed-effects and spatial analysis using DHS 2022/23 data.BMC public health · 2025Article
- COVID-19's effect on healthcare disparities: delivery, reimbursement, and premature mortality in residentially segregated populations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Arabic Version of the Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire: Validation, Factor Analysis, and Rasch Modeling.Health services insights · 2025Article
- Financial barriers and inequalities in healthcare access across East Africa: evidence from demographic and health surveys.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Rheumatic Heart Disease Burden: A Comparative Analysis between the United States and the European Union.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- HPV Vaccination Decision Among Catch-up Population Through a Digital Intervention: Empowering Young Adults to Their Own Health Decision-Making.Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking · 2024Article
- Factors Contributing to Postoperative Radiotherapy Delays in Head and Neck Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Demographic Influences on Awareness of Speech-Language Pathology Services in the U.S.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Disparities in healthcare access and utilization associated with demographic and socioeconomic status hinder advancement of health equity. Thus, we designed a novel equity-focused approach to quantify variations of healthcare access/utilization from the expectation in national target populations. We additionally applied survey-weighted logistic regression models, to identify factors associated with usage of a particular type of health care. To facilitate generation of analysis datasets, we built an National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) knowledge graph to help automate source-level dynamic analyses across different survey years and subjects' characteristics. We performed a cross-sectional subgroup disparity analysis of 2013-2018 NHANES on U.S. adults for receipt of diabetes treatments and vaccines against Hepatitis A (HAV), Hepatitis B (HBV), and Human Papilloma (HPV). Results show that in populations with hemoglobin A1c level ≥6%, patients with non-private insurance were less likely to receive newer and more beneficial antidiabetic medications; being Asian further exacerbated these disparities. For widely used drugs such as insulin, Asians experienced insignificant disparities in odds of prescription compared to White patients but received highly inadequate treatments with regard to their distribution in U.S. diabetic population. Vaccination rates were associated with some demographic/socioeconomic factors but not the others at different degrees for different diseases. For instance, while equity scores increase with rising education levels for HBV, they decrease with rising wealth levels for HPV. Among women vaccinated against HPV, minorities and poor communities usually received Cervarix while non-Hispanic White and higher-income groups received the more comprehensive Gardasil vaccine. Our study identified and quantified the impact of determinants of healthcare utilization for antidiabetic medications and vaccinations. Our new methods for semantics-aware disparity analysis of NHANES data could be readily generalized to other public health goals to support more rapid identification of disparities and development of policies, thus advancing health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.