Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37971977›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Influence of cardiovascular risk factors and treatment exposure on cardiovascular event incidence: Assessment using machine learning algorithms.

Sara Castel-Feced, Sara Malo, Isabel Aguilar-Palacio, Cristina Feja-Solana, José Antonio Casasnovas, Lina Maldonado, María José Rabanaque-Hernández

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sara Castel-FecedMicrobiology, Pediatrics, Radiology, and Public Health, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5064-3763
Sara MaloMicrobiology, Pediatrics, Radiology, and Public Health, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-8275
Isabel Aguilar-PalacioMicrobiology, Pediatrics, Radiology, and Public Health, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Cristina Feja-SolanaFundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
José Antonio CasasnovasHospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), CIBERCV, Zaragoza, Spain.
Lina MaldonadoFundación Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza, Spain.
María José Rabanaque-HernándezMicrobiology, Pediatrics, Radiology, and Public Health, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESGovernment of Spain · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of the influence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) on cardiovascular event (CVE) using machine learning algorithms offers some advantages over preexisting scoring systems, and better enables personalized medicine approaches to cardiovascular prevention. Using data from four different sources, we evaluated the outcomes of three machine learning algorithms for CVE prediction using different combinations of predictive variables and analysed the influence of different CVRF-related variables on CVE prediction when included in these algorithms. A cohort study based on a male cohort of workers applying populational data was conducted. The population of the study consisted of 3746 males. For descriptive analyses, mean and standard deviation were used for quantitative variables, and percentages for categorical ones. Machine learning algorithms used were XGBoost, Random Forest and Naïve Bayes (NB). They were applied to two groups of variables: i) age, physical status, Hypercholesterolemia (HC), Hypertension, and Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and ii) these variables plus treatment exposure, based on the adherence to the treatment for DM, hypertension and HC. All methods point out to the age as the most influential variable in the incidence of a CVE. When considering treatment exposure, it was more influential than any other CVRF, which changed its influence depending on the model and algorithm applied. According to the performance of the algorithms, the most accurate was Random Forest when treatment exposure was considered (F1 score 0.84), followed by XGBoost. Adherence to treatment showed to be an important variable in the risk of having a CVE. These algorithms could be applied to create models for every population, and they can be used in primary care to manage interventions personalized for every subject.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusHypertensionAlgorithmsBayes TheoremCohort StudiesHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansMachine LearningMaleRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID37971977
PMCPMC10653526
OpenAlexW4388729230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.