Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37971792›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Risk Factors and Predictive Models for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Unplanned Extubation in Patients With Cancer: Prospective, Machine Learning Study.

Jinghui Zhang, Guiyuan Ma, Sha Peng, Jianmei Hou, Ran Xu, Lingxia Luo, Jiaji Hu, Nian Yao, Jiaan Wang, Xin Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dislodgement Rates of Tunneled Femoral Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Pediatric Oncology Patients.Journal of infusion nursing : the official publication of the Infusion Nurses Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jinghui ZhangTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7290-9884
Guiyuan MaTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-4169
Sha PengTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7290-9884
Jianmei HouTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9148-4121
Ran XuTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2903-9836
Lingxia LuoTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9148-4121
Jiaji HuTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4263-1842
Nian YaoTeaching and Research Section of Clinical Nursing, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0009-0000-8009-4331
Jiaan WangVascular Access Department, Hainan Provincial People's Hospital, Hainan, China.ORCID 0009-0006-1694-9597
Xin HuangDepartment of Nursing, Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Qinghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9542-1291
Central South University · CNHainan 301 Hospital · CNQinghai University Affiliated Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer indeed represents a significant public health challenge, and unplanned extubation of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-UE) is a critical concern in patient safety. Identifying independent risk factors and implementing high-quality assessment tools for early detection in high-risk populations can play a crucial role in reducing the incidence of PICC-UE among patients with cancer. Precise prevention and treatment strategies are essential to improve patient outcomes and safety in clinical settings.

objectiveThis study aims to identify the independent risk factors associated with PICC-UE in patients with cancer and to construct a predictive model tailored to this group, offering a theoretical framework for anticipating and preventing PICC-UE in these patients.

methodsProspective data were gathered from January to December 2022, encompassing patients with cancer with PICC at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Each patient underwent continuous monitoring until the catheter's removal. The patients were categorized into 2 groups: the UE group (n=3107) and the non-UE group (n=284). Independent risk factors were identified through univariate analysis, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm, and multivariate analysis. Subsequently, the 3391 patients were classified into a train set and a test set in a 7:3 ratio. Utilizing the identified predictors, 3 predictive models were constructed using the logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest algorithms. The ultimate model was selected based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) synthesis analysis. To further validate the model, we gathered prospective data from 600 patients with cancer at the Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University and Hainan Provincial People's Hospital from June to December 2022. We assessed the model's performance using the area under the curve of the ROC to evaluate differentiation, the calibration curve for calibration capability, and decision curve analysis (DCA) to gauge the model's clinical applicability.

resultsIndependent risk factors for PICC-UE in patients with cancer were identified, including impaired physical mobility (odds ratio [OR] 2.775, 95% CI 1.951-3.946), diabetes (OR 1.754, 95% CI 1.134-2.712), surgical history (OR 1.734, 95% CI 1.313-2.290), elevated D-dimer concentration (OR 2.376, 95% CI 1.778-3.176), targeted therapy (OR 1.441, 95% CI 1.104-1.881), surgical treatment (OR 1.543, 95% CI 1.152-2.066), and more than 1 catheter puncture (OR 1.715, 95% CI 1.121-2.624). Protective factors were normal BMI (OR 0.449, 95% CI 0.342-0.590), polyurethane catheter material (OR 0.305, 95% CI 0.228-0.408), and valved catheter (OR 0.639, 95% CI 0.480-0.851). The TOPSIS synthesis analysis results showed that in the train set, the composite index (Ci) values were 0.00 for the logistic model, 0.82 for the support vector machine model, and 0.85 for the random forest model. In the test set, the Ci values were 0.00 for the logistic model, 1.00 for the support vector machine model, and 0.81 for the random forest model. The optimal model, constructed based on the support vector machine, was obtained and validated externally. The ROC curve, calibration curve, and DCA curve demonstrated that the model exhibited excellent accuracy, stability, generalizability, and clinical applicability.

conclusionsIn summary, this study identified 10 independent risk factors for PICC-UE in patients with cancer. The predictive model developed using the support vector machine algorithm demonstrated excellent clinical applicability and was validated externally, providing valuable support for the early prediction of PICC-UE in patients with cancer.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationCatheterization, Central VenousNeoplasmsCathetersHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesRisk FactorscancerlogisticPICCpredictive modelrandom forestsupport vector machineunplanned extubation

Identifiers

PMID37971792
PMCPMC10690529
OpenAlexW4388025564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.