Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37971690›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2023

Screening for Psychological Distress in Healthcare Workers Using Machine Learning: A Proof of Concept.

Steve Geoffrion, Catherine Morse, Marie-Michèle Dufour, Nicolas Bergeron, Stéphane Guay, Marc J Lanovaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steve GeoffrionResearch center of l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM), Montréal, Québec, Canada. s.geoffrion@umontreal.ca.
Catherine MorseResearch center of l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Michèle DufourSchool of Psychoeducation, University of Montreal, Université de Montréal Pavillon Marie-Victorin École de psychoéducation, C. P. 6128, succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Nicolas BergeronDepartment of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Stéphane GuayResearch center of l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Marc J LanovazResearch center of l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Hôpital Louis-H Lafontaine · CAUniversité de Montréal · CACégep Marie-Victorin · CAInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec · CA

Funding

Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Institut de Recherche Robert Sauvé en Santé et Sécurité au Travail 268274Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Ministère de l'Économie et Innovation 2020-2023-COVID19-PSOv2a-51476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to train and test preliminary models using two machine learning algorithms to identify healthcare workers at risk of developing anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The study included data from a prospective cohort study of 816 healthcare workers collected using a mobile application during the first two waves of COVID-19. Each week, the participants responded to 11 questions and completed three screening questionnaires (one for anxiety, one for depression, and one for post-traumatic stress disorder). Then, the research team selected two questions (out of the 11), which were used with biological sex to identify whether scores on each screening questionnaire would be positive or negative. The analyses involved a fivefold cross-validation to test the accuracy of models based on logistic regression and support vector machines using cross-sectional and cumulative measures. The findings indicated that the models derived from the two questions and biological sex accurately identified screening scores for anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorders in 70% to 80% of cases. However, the positive predictive value never exceeded 50%, underlining the importance of collecting more data to train better models. Our proof of concept demonstrates the feasibility of using machine learning to develop novel models to screen for psychological distress in at-risk healthcare workers. Developing models with fewer questions may reduce burdens of active monitoring in practical settings by decreasing the weekly assessment duration.

Indexed as

AnxietyPsychological DistressCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionHealth PersonnelHumansProspective StudiesAnxietyDepressionHealthcare workersMachine learningPost-traumatic stress disorder

Identifiers

PMID37971690
OpenAlexW4388726601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.