ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023
Robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma in adolescents: a case series.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic assisted (RA) retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) has grown in popularity as it offers decreased morbidity and faster recovery compared to the open technique. Proponents of open surgery raised concerns about the oncological fidelity of the RA approach for testicular tumors where complete resection is needed. In boys > 10 years with paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), RPLND is indicated for staging purposes only. In this population, the RA technique should provide its benefits without concerns for oncological compromise. We present an analysis of RA-RPLND for boys with paratesticular RMS. We queried our institution's prospectively collected database of pediatric robotic cases for patients undergoing RA-RPLND post-radical orchiectomy for paratesticular mass, confirmed by pathology as RMS. Demographic, surgical, follow-up, and oncological outcomes were evaluated between 2017 and 2023. Five patients underwent RA-RPLND for paratesticular RMS. The median age was 16.1 years (15-17), with median OR time of 456 min (357-508). No conversions to open occurred. Inpatient median total opioid use was 1.8 (0.4-2.7) morphine equivalent/kg. The median lymph node yield was 27 (8-44) and post-op length of stay was 3 days (2-5). The median time to initiating adjuvant chemotherapy was 10.5 days (7-13). One patient had complications: pneumothorax attributed to central line placement and chyle leak that resolved in 1 week with dietary restriction. Our series demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the RA approach for RPLND in pediatric patients with paratesticular RMS. This is the most extensive case series currently in the literature and the only one exclusively done for paratesticular RMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.