ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023
The impact of intraoperative MRI on cranial surgical site infections-a single-center analysis.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of risk factors of intracranial infection after microvascular decompression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Navigating Brain Metastases: Unveiling the Potential of 3-Tesla Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe use of intraoperative MRI (ioMRI) contributes to an improved extent of resection. Hybrid operating room MRI suites have been established, with the patient being transferred to the MRI scanner. In the present descriptive analysis, we compared the rate of surgical site infections (SSI) after intracranial tumor surgery with and without the use of ioMRI.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we included 446 patients with open craniotomy performed for brain tumor surgery. One hundred fourteen patients were operated on with the use of ioMRI between June 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019 (group 1). During the same period, 126 patients were operated on without ioMRI (group 2). As an additional control group, we analyzed 206 patients operated on from February 1, 2017, to February 28, 2018 when ioMRI had not yet been implemented (group 3).
resultsThe rate of SSI in group 1 (11.4%), group 2 (9.5%), and group 3 (6.8%) did not differ significantly (p = 0.352). Additional resection after ioMRI did not result in a significantly elevated number of SSI. No significant influence of re-resection, prior radio-/chemotherapy, blood loss or duration of surgery was found on the incidence of SSI.
conclusionDespite the transfer to a non-sterile MRI scanner, leading to a prolonged operation time, SSI rates with and without the use of ioMRI did not differ significantly. Hence, advantages of ioMRI outweigh potential disadvantages as confirmed by this real-life single-center study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.